| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - AceRimmer (Nov 19, 2010, 11:17 am) |
Maslow, I'm going to agree with poobaloo here: your post is discussing semantics / word games.
Chiefly, you seem to be trying to define a difference between invalid and illegal. I'm guessing that[Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 12:05 pm |
So, perhaps, I should restate the issue at hand as I see it:
When should a GM declare that a unit's order is unadjudicable and therefore defaults to 'Unit Holds'?
Ok, so what |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - FuzzyLogic (Nov 19, 2010, 8:48 am) |
We're in agreement here, no? I can't quite tell these examples are so wacky. 
Therefore Lon to Bel might be illegal because of other units.
Lon-Bel is valid even if yo[Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - Blueraider0 (Nov 19, 2010, 1:49 am) |
| If that's the case, when would an order ever be invalid or illegal? I suppose attempting to move a unit that is not one's own, or ordering a unit that does not exist is invalid, But even then, you sa [Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 08:48 am |
We're in agreement here, no? I can't quite tell these examples are so wacky.
Therefore Lon to Bel might be illegal because of other units.
Lon-Bel is valid even if yo |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 19, 11:17 am |
Maslow, I'm going to agree with poobaloo here: your post is discussing semantics / word games.
Chiefly, you seem to be trying to define a difference between invalid and illegal. I'm guessing that |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 12:05 pm |
So, perhaps, I should restate the issue at hand as I see it:
When should a GM declare that a unit's order is unadjudicable and therefore defaults to 'Unit Holds'?
Ok, so what |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - FuzzyLogic (Nov 15, 2010, 11:20 am) |
| I see the logic, it just seems you should be able to determine if a unit's order is valid w/o regard for other units' positions. i.e. you can take a blank board, put a single unit on Lon and say "Is [Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 19, 01:49 am |
| If that's the case, when would an order ever be invalid or illegal? I suppose attempting to move a unit that is not one's own, or ordering a unit that does not exist is invalid, But even then, you sa |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 08:48 am |
We're in agreement here, no? I can't quite tell these examples are so wacky.
Therefore Lon to Bel might be illegal because of other units.
Lon-Bel is valid even if yo |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 19, 11:17 am |
Maslow, I'm going to agree with poobaloo here: your post is discussing semantics / word games.
Chiefly, you seem to be trying to define a difference between invalid and illegal. I'm guessing that |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 12:05 pm |
So, perhaps, I should restate the issue at hand as I see it:
When should a GM declare that a unit's order is unadjudicable and therefore defaults to 'Unit Holds'?
Ok, so what |
| Reply notification - AceRimmer (Nov 15, 2010, 10:56 am) |
| "I would insist that the valid set of moves for a unit are not dependent on the lack or presence of other units. I think if you order A Lon-Pic, even if there is no fleet in ENG, it is as valid a mov [Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 15, 11:20 am |
| I see the logic, it just seems you should be able to determine if a unit's order is valid w/o regard for other units' positions. i.e. you can take a blank board, put a single unit on Lon and say "Is |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 19, 01:49 am |
| If that's the case, when would an order ever be invalid or illegal? I suppose attempting to move a unit that is not one's own, or ordering a unit that does not exist is invalid, But even then, you sa |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 08:48 am |
We're in agreement here, no? I can't quite tell these examples are so wacky.
Therefore Lon to Bel might be illegal because of other units.
Lon-Bel is valid even if yo |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 19, 11:17 am |
Maslow, I'm going to agree with poobaloo here: your post is discussing semantics / word games.
Chiefly, you seem to be trying to define a difference between invalid and illegal. I'm guessing that |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 12:05 pm |
So, perhaps, I should restate the issue at hand as I see it:
When should a GM declare that a unit's order is unadjudicable and therefore defaults to 'Unit Holds'?
Ok, so what |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - FuzzyLogic (Nov 15, 2010, 9:49 am) |
I would argue that, since there is not an unbroken chain of fleets running from Belgium to NAf, the army's order is invalid and should be treated as A Bel Holds.
I would insist that[Reply] |
| Reply notification (Community) AceRimmer Nov 15, 10:56 am |
| "I would insist that the valid set of moves for a unit are not dependent on the lack or presence of other units. I think if you order A Lon-Pic, even if there is no fleet in ENG, it is as valid a mov |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 15, 11:20 am |
| I see the logic, it just seems you should be able to determine if a unit's order is valid w/o regard for other units' positions. i.e. you can take a blank board, put a single unit on Lon and say "Is |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 19, 01:49 am |
| If that's the case, when would an order ever be invalid or illegal? I suppose attempting to move a unit that is not one's own, or ordering a unit that does not exist is invalid, But even then, you sa |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 08:48 am |
We're in agreement here, no? I can't quite tell these examples are so wacky.
Therefore Lon to Bel might be illegal because of other units.
Lon-Bel is valid even if yo |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 19, 11:17 am |
Maslow, I'm going to agree with poobaloo here: your post is discussing semantics / word games.
Chiefly, you seem to be trying to define a difference between invalid and illegal. I'm guessing that |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 12:05 pm |
So, perhaps, I should restate the issue at hand as I see it:
When should a GM declare that a unit's order is unadjudicable and therefore defaults to 'Unit Holds'?
Ok, so what |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - Blueraider0 (Nov 13, 2010, 12:12 am) |
| Aahhhh, dang it I apparently didn't actually post my response. Crud, and it was so brilliant and funny and intellectually stunning! Well, here's take 2. And if it sucks, just know there is a better [Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - AceRimmer (Nov 12, 2010, 10:23 am) |
Generally, I agree with poobaloo's interpretations.
Maslow and I did go back to the rulebook. Maslow pointed out the rule stating "An Army can be ordered to move into an adjacent inland or coastal[Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 13, 12:12 am |
| Aahhhh, dang it I apparently didn't actually post my response. Crud, and it was so brilliant and funny and intellectually stunning! Well, here's take 2. And if it sucks, just know there is a better |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 15, 09:49 am |
I would argue that, since there is not an unbroken chain of fleets running from Belgium to NAf, the army's order is invalid and should be treated as A Bel Holds.
I would insist that |
| Reply notification (Community) AceRimmer Nov 15, 10:56 am |
| "I would insist that the valid set of moves for a unit are not dependent on the lack or presence of other units. I think if you order A Lon-Pic, even if there is no fleet in ENG, it is as valid a mov |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 15, 11:20 am |
| I see the logic, it just seems you should be able to determine if a unit's order is valid w/o regard for other units' positions. i.e. you can take a blank board, put a single unit on Lon and say "Is |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 19, 01:49 am |
| If that's the case, when would an order ever be invalid or illegal? I suppose attempting to move a unit that is not one's own, or ordering a unit that does not exist is invalid, But even then, you sa |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 08:48 am |
We're in agreement here, no? I can't quite tell these examples are so wacky.
Therefore Lon to Bel might be illegal because of other units.
Lon-Bel is valid even if yo |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 19, 11:17 am |
Maslow, I'm going to agree with poobaloo here: your post is discussing semantics / word games.
Chiefly, you seem to be trying to define a difference between invalid and illegal. I'm guessing that |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 12:05 pm |
So, perhaps, I should restate the issue at hand as I see it:
When should a GM declare that a unit's order is unadjudicable and therefore defaults to 'Unit Holds'?
Ok, so what |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - AceRimmer (Nov 12, 2010, 10:14 am) |
Maslow, I'd say that your question is rendered moot by the section of the rules entitled:
"Support" Cannot Be Convoyed.
At least that puzzle is easily solved [Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - Blueraider0 (Nov 12, 2010, 2:07 am) |
I won't spoil any of the opinions Adam and I have in store, but I was reviewing the rules per Michael's reference, and found this gem:
"The province to which a unit is providing support must be one[Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 12, 10:14 am |
Maslow, I'd say that your question is rendered moot by the section of the rules entitled:
"Support" Cannot Be Convoyed.
At least that puzzle is easily solved |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - garry.bledsoe (Nov 11, 2010, 3:29 pm) |
| So I have a bit of a different take. I think that the rules are only sort of black and white because they still require a GM to make a decision - does a typo/mistake by the player allow a unit to hold [Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 12, 02:07 am |
I won't spoil any of the opinions Adam and I have in store, but I was reviewing the rules per Michael's reference, and found this gem:
"The province to which a unit is providing support must be one |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 12, 10:14 am |
Maslow, I'd say that your question is rendered moot by the section of the rules entitled:
"Support" Cannot Be Convoyed.
At least that puzzle is easily solved |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - s2000chops (Nov 11, 2010, 11:25 am) |
I think, for the same reason, that order #2 (with A Bel - Par) should also be valid. Par is not a valid destination from Belgium, so the move is invalid and the unit holds.
The NAF case is the tric[Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) garry.bledsoe Nov 11, 03:29 pm |
| So I have a bit of a different take. I think that the rules are only sort of black and white because they still require a GM to make a decision - does a typo/mistake by the player allow a unit to hold |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 12, 02:07 am |
I won't spoil any of the opinions Adam and I have in store, but I was reviewing the rules per Michael's reference, and found this gem:
"The province to which a unit is providing support must be one |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 12, 10:14 am |
Maslow, I'd say that your question is rendered moot by the section of the rules entitled:
"Support" Cannot Be Convoyed.
At least that puzzle is easily solved |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - FuzzyLogic (Nov 10, 2010, 9:54 pm) |
Upon further review, I believe even #5 is clear:
An Army can be ordered to move into an adjacent inland or coastal province.
and...
[quote]A Fleet can be ordered to move to an[Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) s2000chops Nov 11, 11:25 am |
I think, for the same reason, that order #2 (with A Bel - Par) should also be valid. Par is not a valid destination from Belgium, so the move is invalid and the unit holds.
The NAF case is the tric |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) garry.bledsoe Nov 11, 03:29 pm |
| So I have a bit of a different take. I think that the rules are only sort of black and white because they still require a GM to make a decision - does a typo/mistake by the player allow a unit to hold |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 12, 02:07 am |
I won't spoil any of the opinions Adam and I have in store, but I was reviewing the rules per Michael's reference, and found this gem:
"The province to which a unit is providing support must be one |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 12, 10:14 am |
Maslow, I'd say that your question is rendered moot by the section of the rules entitled:
"Support" Cannot Be Convoyed.
At least that puzzle is easily solved |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - FuzzyLogic (Nov 10, 2010, 9:39 pm) |
The pertinent rules are:
[quote](1) A unit not ordered to move can be supported by a support order that only mentions its province. A unit that is ordered to hold, convoy, support, or not ordered at[Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 10, 09:54 pm |
Upon further review, I believe even #5 is clear:
An Army can be ordered to move into an adjacent inland or coastal province.
and...
[quote]A Fleet can be ordered to move to an |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) s2000chops Nov 11, 11:25 am |
I think, for the same reason, that order #2 (with A Bel - Par) should also be valid. Par is not a valid destination from Belgium, so the move is invalid and the unit holds.
The NAF case is the tric |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) garry.bledsoe Nov 11, 03:29 pm |
| So I have a bit of a different take. I think that the rules are only sort of black and white because they still require a GM to make a decision - does a typo/mistake by the player allow a unit to hold |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 12, 02:07 am |
I won't spoil any of the opinions Adam and I have in store, but I was reviewing the rules per Michael's reference, and found this gem:
"The province to which a unit is providing support must be one |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 12, 10:14 am |
Maslow, I'd say that your question is rendered moot by the section of the rules entitled:
"Support" Cannot Be Convoyed.
At least that puzzle is easily solved |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 12, 10:23 am |
Generally, I agree with poobaloo's interpretations.
Maslow and I did go back to the rulebook. Maslow pointed out the rule stating "An Army can be ordered to move into an adjacent inland or coastal |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 13, 12:12 am |
| Aahhhh, dang it I apparently didn't actually post my response. Crud, and it was so brilliant and funny and intellectually stunning! Well, here's take 2. And if it sucks, just know there is a better |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 15, 09:49 am |
I would argue that, since there is not an unbroken chain of fleets running from Belgium to NAf, the army's order is invalid and should be treated as A Bel Holds.
I would insist that |
| Reply notification (Community) AceRimmer Nov 15, 10:56 am |
| "I would insist that the valid set of moves for a unit are not dependent on the lack or presence of other units. I think if you order A Lon-Pic, even if there is no fleet in ENG, it is as valid a mov |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 15, 11:20 am |
| I see the logic, it just seems you should be able to determine if a unit's order is valid w/o regard for other units' positions. i.e. you can take a blank board, put a single unit on Lon and say "Is |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 19, 01:49 am |
| If that's the case, when would an order ever be invalid or illegal? I suppose attempting to move a unit that is not one's own, or ordering a unit that does not exist is invalid, But even then, you sa |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 08:48 am |
We're in agreement here, no? I can't quite tell these examples are so wacky.
Therefore Lon to Bel might be illegal because of other units.
Lon-Bel is valid even if yo |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 19, 11:17 am |
Maslow, I'm going to agree with poobaloo here: your post is discussing semantics / word games.
Chiefly, you seem to be trying to define a difference between invalid and illegal. I'm guessing that |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 12:05 pm |
So, perhaps, I should restate the issue at hand as I see it:
When should a GM declare that a unit's order is unadjudicable and therefore defaults to 'Unit Holds'?
Ok, so what |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question - AceRimmer (Nov 10, 2010, 10:06 am) |
| Maslow and I have been having a conversation about supports offered to invalidly ordered units. I am curious what other GMs think. Since we're soliciting opinions, we will wait a little while before [Reply] |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 10, 09:39 pm |
The pertinent rules are:
[quote](1) A unit not ordered to move can be supported by a support order that only mentions its province. A unit that is ordered to hold, convoy, support, or not ordered at |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 10, 09:54 pm |
Upon further review, I believe even #5 is clear:
An Army can be ordered to move into an adjacent inland or coastal province.
and...
[quote]A Fleet can be ordered to move to an |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) s2000chops Nov 11, 11:25 am |
I think, for the same reason, that order #2 (with A Bel - Par) should also be valid. Par is not a valid destination from Belgium, so the move is invalid and the unit holds.
The NAF case is the tric |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) garry.bledsoe Nov 11, 03:29 pm |
| So I have a bit of a different take. I think that the rules are only sort of black and white because they still require a GM to make a decision - does a typo/mistake by the player allow a unit to hold |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 12, 02:07 am |
I won't spoil any of the opinions Adam and I have in store, but I was reviewing the rules per Michael's reference, and found this gem:
"The province to which a unit is providing support must be one |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 12, 10:14 am |
Maslow, I'd say that your question is rendered moot by the section of the rules entitled:
"Support" Cannot Be Convoyed.
At least that puzzle is easily solved |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 12, 10:23 am |
Generally, I agree with poobaloo's interpretations.
Maslow and I did go back to the rulebook. Maslow pointed out the rule stating "An Army can be ordered to move into an adjacent inland or coastal |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 13, 12:12 am |
| Aahhhh, dang it I apparently didn't actually post my response. Crud, and it was so brilliant and funny and intellectually stunning! Well, here's take 2. And if it sucks, just know there is a better |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 15, 09:49 am |
I would argue that, since there is not an unbroken chain of fleets running from Belgium to NAf, the army's order is invalid and should be treated as A Bel Holds.
I would insist that |
| Reply notification (Community) AceRimmer Nov 15, 10:56 am |
| "I would insist that the valid set of moves for a unit are not dependent on the lack or presence of other units. I think if you order A Lon-Pic, even if there is no fleet in ENG, it is as valid a mov |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 15, 11:20 am |
| I see the logic, it just seems you should be able to determine if a unit's order is valid w/o regard for other units' positions. i.e. you can take a blank board, put a single unit on Lon and say "Is |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) Blueraider0 Nov 19, 01:49 am |
| If that's the case, when would an order ever be invalid or illegal? I suppose attempting to move a unit that is not one's own, or ordering a unit that does not exist is invalid, But even then, you sa |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 08:48 am |
We're in agreement here, no? I can't quite tell these examples are so wacky.
Therefore Lon to Bel might be illegal because of other units.
Lon-Bel is valid even if yo |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) AceRimmer Nov 19, 11:17 am |
Maslow, I'm going to agree with poobaloo here: your post is discussing semantics / word games.
Chiefly, you seem to be trying to define a difference between invalid and illegal. I'm guessing that |
| For GMs: Invalid order - Support Question (Community) FuzzyLogic Nov 19, 12:05 pm |
So, perhaps, I should restate the issue at hand as I see it:
When should a GM declare that a unit's order is unadjudicable and therefore defaults to 'Unit Holds'?
Ok, so what |
| Dip in classroom - dknemeyer (Oct 15, 2010, 9:43 am) |
| In real life I host my company's podcast. This week for our theme "Games and Learning" I had on a high school teacher who has a two week block each year dedicated to playing Diplomacy. Thought some of [Reply] |
| Diplomacy World #111 Released! - diplomacyworld (Oct 04, 2010, 4:17 pm) |
Here is my initial Diplomacy World announcement:
Diplomacy World #111, the Fall 2010 Issue, is now available! Inside you'll find:
* Conrad Woodring on one of the most difficult journeys ever to[Reply] |
| Eternal Sunshine #45 Released - diplomacyworld (Sep 29, 2010, 11:02 am) |
The new October 2010 issue of Eternal Sunshine, #45, is now available in both pdf and html formats. You can find it at:
http://www.whiningkentpigs.com/DW/
Included in this issue is the usual[Reply] |
| Next GM? - Sean2010 (Sep 24, 2010, 3:39 pm) |
Michael,
I'm interested in taking a shot at GMing standard since this will be my first attempt at Gming.[Reply] |
| Next GM? - FuzzyLogic (Sep 23, 2010, 12:57 pm) |
Woohoo!
Glad to have ya. Who's after Warren?
Any takers??
-mike[Reply] |
| Next GM? (Community) Sean2010 Sep 24, 03:39 pm |
Michael,
I'm interested in taking a shot at GMing standard since this will be my first attempt at Gming. |
| Next GM? - alwayshunted (Sep 21, 2010, 6:09 pm) |
| Put me on the list for another if you like Mike. [Reply] |
| Next GM? (Community) FuzzyLogic Sep 23, 12:57 pm |
Woohoo!
Glad to have ya. Who's after Warren?
Any takers??
-mike |
| Next GM? (Community) Sean2010 Sep 24, 03:39 pm |
Michael,
I'm interested in taking a shot at GMing standard since this will be my first attempt at Gming. |
| Will someone run a priivate game? - dknemeyer (Sep 20, 2010, 12:22 pm) |
| While I didn't want to take on another full game I would actually be happy to adjudicate in Garry's absence so this game can continued uninterrupted, if it is OK with Garry... [Reply] |
| Will someone run a priivate game? - garry.bledsoe (Sep 20, 2010, 10:18 am) |
Hey...my time away will be from the 13th of Oct to approx. the 29th of Oct. So there would be nothing completed during that time. Other than that I am ready to run it.
g[Reply] |
| Will someone run a priivate game? (Community) dknemeyer Sep 20, 12:22 pm |
| While I didn't want to take on another full game I would actually be happy to adjudicate in Garry's absence so this game can continued uninterrupted, if it is OK with Garry... |
| Next GM? - FuzzyLogic (Sep 18, 2010, 11:37 am) |
It is indeed! Either a Stonehenge or Dark Ages would probly fill fast.
We still need Standard game GMs! Our queue is down to 0 ready in the wings...
-mike[Reply] |
| Next GM? (Community) alwayshunted Sep 21, 06:09 pm |
| Put me on the list for another if you like Mike. |
| Next GM? (Community) FuzzyLogic Sep 23, 12:57 pm |
Woohoo!
Glad to have ya. Who's after Warren?
Any takers??
-mike |
| Next GM? (Community) Sean2010 Sep 24, 03:39 pm |
Michael,
I'm interested in taking a shot at GMing standard since this will be my first attempt at Gming. |
| Will someone run a priivate game? - MrSmiley (Sep 17, 2010, 10:58 am) |
Garry,
Yes! They would be signing up at DC! They have been looking over the site for the last couple weeks.
So that I know what to tell the other players, could we get someone to fill in while[Reply] |
| Will someone run a priivate game? (Community) garry.bledsoe Sep 20, 10:18 am |
Hey...my time away will be from the 13th of Oct to approx. the 29th of Oct. So there would be nothing completed during that time. Other than that I am ready to run it.
g |
| Will someone run a priivate game? (Community) dknemeyer Sep 20, 12:22 pm |
| While I didn't want to take on another full game I would actually be happy to adjudicate in Garry's absence so this game can continued uninterrupted, if it is OK with Garry... |
