| dc296 Round 1 Board 6 - Fall 1904 Results - demainlesdauphins (Feb 07, 2010, 11:03 pm) |
Hi guys,
sorry I didn't have time to answer to anybody. Too much work. I'll do it today.
Fab
From: fredrik-at-familjenblom.se
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 20:01:42 +0100
Subject: Re: dc296 Round 1 Board 6 - Fall 1904 Results
To: bielschowsky.f-at-googlemail.com; welsh_stroud-at-msn.com; ddz999cat23-at-yahoo.com; demainlesdauphins-at-hotmail.com; mdemagogue-at-gmail.com; mariamontes1990-at-hotmail.es; blitz-at-diplomaticcorp.com
Blitzers,
Here are the results for the Autumn & Winter 1904. I'm not going to analyze the situation at all - I'll leave it all to you to analyze it (it is Friday evening here in Sweden after all!). Happy blitzing!
Next turn: Spring 1905 Movement
Next Deadline: Monday, 8th of February 2010, 19:00 GMT (7PM).
Autumn retreats:
Austria:
A Vienna - Trieste
Germany:
F Denmark - Baltic Sea
Italy:
disband F Tyrrhenian Sea
Turkey:
disband F Constantinople
Winter adjustments:
Austria:
Remove A Livonia
England:
Remove F North Atlantic Ocean
France:
Build F Brest
Build A Paris
Russia:
Build A Warsaw
Build A Sevastopol
Standings:
Ownership:
Austria (7): Budapest, Greece, Rumania, Serbia, Smyrna, Trieste, Venice.
England (6): Denmark, Edinburgh, Liverpool, London, Norway, St Petersburg.
France ( : Belgium, Brest, Marseilles, Paris, Portugal, Rome, Spain, Tunis.
Germany (5): Berlin, Holland, Kiel, Munich, Vienna.
Russia (6): Bulgaria, Constantinople, Moscow, Sevastopol, Sweden, Warsaw.
Turkey (2): Ankara, Naples.
Players:
Germany: Frank Bielschowsky - bielschowsky.f-at-googlemail.com ([email]bielschowsky.f-at-googlemail.com[/email])
France: Charles Welsh - welsh_stroud-at-msn.com ([email]welsh_stroud-at-msn.com[/email])
Austria: Daniel Dzikowicz - ddz999cat23-at-yahoo.com ([email]ddz999cat23-at-yahoo.com[/email])
Russia: Fabrice Essner - demainlesdauphins-at-hotmail.com ([email]demainlesdauphins-at-hotmail.com[/email])
England: Mark Utterback - MDemagogue-at-gmail.com ([email]MDemagogue-at-gmail.com[/email])
Turkey: Maria Montes - MariaMontes1990-at-hotmail.es ([email]MariaMontes1990-at-hotmail.es[/email])
Italy: Eliminated
Next turn: Spring 1905 Movement
Next Deadline: Monday, 8th of February 2010, 19:00 GMT (7PM).
/Fredrik
Windows 7 : Trouvez le PC qui vous convient! Découvrez notre offre ![Reply] |
| DC289: Annoyed GM - DucatiRider (Feb 07, 2010, 10:03 pm) |
Arn't there other options here? I mean this is getting ridiculous. Please don't allow a replacement that hasn't played a game yet. Perhaps that would help?
Here's what I propose:
Delete Austria from the game. It's home SC arn't counted for 5 years. That way his neighbors don't have free SCs to immediately go after. I guess France and England are the only ones that wouldn't benefit from this though.
Or, what if we all submitted orders for Austria? Whichever move order got the most would be what that unit does? We keep doing this until a replacement is found so we can keep the game going.
If a replacement is found soon please don't set the deadline for another week. I'd say 48-72 hours.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])> wrote:
Hey guys,
Still no word from our Austrian player. I've got no choice at this point but to seek a new player. I've put the game back into recruiting mode.
Hopefully we'll find a replacement soon and can get back to the game.
Matthew
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:801f25bfd1]Hey guys,
Deadline's here and I'm still waiting for Austrian orders. I'm invoking Austria's one-time 24h grace period. You are all free to submit new orders during this time.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:801f25bfd1]Hi Folks,
This is your friendly 24h reminder for Fall 1901. I'm still missing orders from England, France, Italy, and Austria.
In future turns, please consider submitting preliminary orders as soon as is convenient. You can always change them once you've had some time, and you reduce your risk of NMR to zero.
Cheers,
Matthew
[/quote:801f25bfd1]
[/quote:801f25bfd1][Reply] |
| DC289: Annoyed GM (dc289) Rocketship Feb 08, 12:23 am |
Hi All,
The way I see it, we have three options:
1. Find a replacement and allow a sufficient amount of time for him to meet and negotiate with everyone.
2. Continue the game using some ad-hoc, six-player rules.
3. Have someone propose a 6-way draw; everyone signs up for new games and hopes for the best.
I strongly favor option 1 and strongly disfavor option 2. If anyone disagrees, now would be the time to speak up. Feel free to e-mail me privately on this matter.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 7, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Mark Jefferson wrote:
Arn't there other options here? I mean this is getting ridiculous. Please don't allow a replacement that hasn't played a game yet. Perhaps that would help?
Here's what I propose:
Delete Austria from the game. It's home SC arn't counted for 5 years. That way his neighbors don't have free SCs to immediately go after. I guess France and England are the only ones that wouldn't benefit from this though.
Or, what if we all submitted orders for Austria? Whichever move order got the most would be what that unit does? We keep doing this until a replacement is found so we can keep the game going.
If a replacement is found soon please don't set the deadline for another week. I'd say 48-72 hours.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])> wrote:
[quote:fca2c6fcde] Hey guys,
Still no word from our Austrian player. I've got no choice at this point but to seek a new player. I've put the game back into recruiting mode.
Hopefully we'll find a replacement soon and can get back to the game.
Matthew
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:fca2c6fcde]Hey guys,
Deadline's here and I'm still waiting for Austrian orders. I'm invoking Austria's one-time 24h grace period. You are all free to submit new orders during this time.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:fca2c6fcde]Hi Folks,
This is your friendly 24h reminder for Fall 1901. I'm still missing orders from England, France, Italy, and Austria.
In future turns, please consider submitting preliminary orders as soon as is convenient. You can always change them once you've had some time, and you reduce your risk of NMR to zero.
Cheers,
Matthew
[/quote:fca2c6fcde]
[/quote:fca2c6fcde]
[/quote:fca2c6fcde] |
| DC289: Annoyed GM (dc289) pontusstrimling at yah... Feb 08, 05:16 am |
I completely agree and I'd say that if anyone has doubts about their commitment to the game now would be the time to drop out. That way this should be the last replacement for a while.
Chochem
--- Den mån 2010-02-08 skrev Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com>:
Från: Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com>
Ämne: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
Till: "Mark Jefferson" <markj18-at-gmail.com>, "John Clarke" <john.c1arke-at-btinternet.com>, "... ..." <ecommander0-at-hotmail.com>, "Owen Hoyes" <necaalor-at-gmail.com>, diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com, "Jeffrey Clay" <jmc66-at-mac.com>, "Pontus Strimling" <pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com>
Kopia: dc289-at-diplomaticcorp.com, "Garry Bledsoe" <kielmarch-at-hotmail.com>, "Jason K" <Githraine-at-yahoo.com>, "Michael Sims" <mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net>, blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com
Datum: måndag 8 februari 2010 07.23
Hi All,
The way I see it, we have three
options:
1. Find a replacement and allow a
sufficient amount of time for him to meet and negotiate with
everyone.
2. Continue the game using some ad-hoc,
six-player rules.
3. Have someone propose a 6-way draw;
everyone signs up for new games and hopes for the
best.
I strongly favor option 1 and strongly disfavor
option 2. If anyone disagrees, now would be the time
to speak up. Feel free to e-mail me privately on this
matter.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 7, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Mark Jefferson
wrote:
Arn't there other options here? I mean
this is getting ridiculous. Please don't allow a
replacement that hasn't played a game yet. Perhaps
that would help?
Here's what I propose:
Delete Austria from the game. It's home SC
arn't counted for 5 years. That way his neighbors
don't have free SCs to immediately go after. I
guess France and England are the only ones that wouldn't
benefit from this though.
Or, what if we all submitted orders for Austria?
Whichever move order got the most would be what that unit
does? We keep doing this until a replacement is found
so we can keep the game going.
If a replacement is found soon please don't set the
deadline for another week. I'd say 48-72 hours.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:02 PM,
Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com>
wrote:
Hey guys,
Still no word from our Austrian player. I've got
no choice at this point but to seek a new player.
I've put the game back into recruiting mode.
Hopefully we'll find a replacement soon and can get
back to the game.
Matthew
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:778c7d1174]Hey guys,
Deadline's here and I'm still waiting for
Austrian orders. I'm invoking Austria's
one-time 24h grace period. You are all free to submit
new orders during this time.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:778c7d1174]Hi Folks,
[/quote:778c7d1174]
[quote:778c7d1174]This is your friendly 24h reminder for Fall 1901.
[/quote:778c7d1174] I'm still missing orders from England, France,
Italy, and Austria.
[quote:778c7d1174]In future turns, please consider submitting
[/quote:778c7d1174]preliminary orders as soon as is convenient. You can
always change them once you've had some time, and you
reduce your risk of NMR to zero.
[quote:778c7d1174]Cheers,
[/quote:778c7d1174]
[quote:778c7d1174]Matthew
[/quote:778c7d1174]
[/quote:778c7d1174]
__________________________________________________
Använder du Yahoo!?
Är du trött på spam? Yahoo! E-post har det bästa spamskyddet som finns
http://se.mail.yahoo.com |
| DC289: Annoyed GM (dc289) FuzzyLogic Feb 08, 08:34 am |
Hey guys,
Just watching quietly here as I help out finding new players for games that need them... It's actually good (in a way) that the quitters weed out early. Since you have Matthew running your game, and not some automated system, when things like this come up, at least you know that he is going to find a good group, and the game will eventually be "on". If any of you committed players want to join a second game in the mean time, you're welcome to do so. You may have to ask a GM to put you in the game if you're new and the system only lets you into 1 game at a time. Just so you arent holding here waiting forever for a game to start.
-mike
From: Pontus Strimling [mailto:pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com]
Sent: Mon 2/8/2010 5:16 AM
To: Mark Jefferson; John Clarke; ... ...; Owen Hoyes; diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com; Jeffrey Clay; Rocketship
Cc: dc289; Garry Bledsoe; Jason K; Michael Sims; blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com
Subject: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
I completely agree and I'd say that if anyone has doubts about their commitment to the game now would be the time to drop out. That way this should be the last replacement for a while.
Chochem
--- Den mån 2010-02-08 skrev Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com>:
Från: Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com>
Ämne: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
Till: "Mark Jefferson" <markj18-at-gmail.com>, "John Clarke" <john.c1arke-at-btinternet.com>, "... ..." <ecommander0-at-hotmail.com>, "Owen Hoyes" <necaalor-at-gmail.com>, diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com, "Jeffrey Clay" <jmc66-at-mac.com>, "Pontus Strimling" <pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com>
Kopia: dc289-at-diplomaticcorp.com, "Garry Bledsoe" <kielmarch-at-hotmail.com>, "Jason K" <Githraine-at-yahoo.com>, "Michael Sims" <mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net>, blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com
Datum: måndag 8 februari 2010 07.23
Hi All,
The way I see it, we have three
options:
1. Find a replacement and allow a
sufficient amount of time for him to meet and negotiate with
everyone.
2. Continue the game using some ad-hoc,
six-player rules.
3. Have someone propose a 6-way draw;
everyone signs up for new games and hopes for the
best.
I strongly favor option 1 and strongly disfavor
option 2. If anyone disagrees, now would be the time
to speak up. Feel free to e-mail me privately on this
matter.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 7, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Mark Jefferson
wrote:
Arn't there other options here? I mean
this is getting ridiculous. Please don't allow a
replacement that hasn't played a game yet. Perhaps
that would help?
Here's what I propose:
Delete Austria from the game. It's home SC
arn't counted for 5 years. That way his neighbors
don't have free SCs to immediately go after. I
guess France and England are the only ones that wouldn't
benefit from this though.
Or, what if we all submitted orders for Austria?
Whichever move order got the most would be what that unit
does? We keep doing this until a replacement is found
so we can keep the game going.
If a replacement is found soon please don't set the
deadline for another week. I'd say 48-72 hours.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:02 PM,
Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com>
wrote:
Hey guys,
Still no word from our Austrian player. I've got
no choice at this point but to seek a new player.
I've put the game back into recruiting mode.
Hopefully we'll find a replacement soon and can get
back to the game.
Matthew
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:272add58d8]Hey guys,
Deadline's here and I'm still waiting for
Austrian orders. I'm invoking Austria's
one-time 24h grace period. You are all free to submit
new orders during this time.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:272add58d8]Hi Folks,
[/quote:272add58d8]
[quote:272add58d8]This is your friendly 24h reminder for Fall 1901.
[/quote:272add58d8]I'm still missing orders from England, France,
Italy, and Austria.
[quote:272add58d8]In future turns, please consider submitting
[/quote:272add58d8]preliminary orders as soon as is convenient. You can
always change them once you've had some time, and you
reduce your risk of NMR to zero.
[quote:272add58d8]Cheers,
[/quote:272add58d8]
[quote:272add58d8]Matthew
[/quote:272add58d8]
[/quote:272add58d8]
__________________________________________________
Använder du Yahoo!?
Är du trött på spam? Yahoo! E-post har det bästa spamskyddet som finns
http://se.mail.yahoo.com |
| DC289: Annoyed GM (dc289) DucatiRider Feb 08, 11:17 am |
I admit waiting for a replacement and giving them a week is the only fair system. It kind of sucks though.
I don't favor drawing this game because whatever game we go to next is likely to have the same problems. Is there a game series that is only for players that have completed at least one game?
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Michael Sims <mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net ([email]mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net[/email])> wrote:
Hey guys,
Just watching quietly here as I help out finding new players for games that need them... It's actually good (in a way) that the quitters weed out early. Since you have Matthew running your game, and not some automated system, when things like this come up, at least you know that he is going to find a good group, and the game will eventually be "on". If any of you committed players want to join a second game in the mean time, you're welcome to do so. You may have to ask a GM to put you in the game if you're new and the system only lets you into 1 game at a time. Just so you arent holding here waiting forever for a game to start.
-mike
From: Pontus Strimling [mailto:pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com ([email]pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com[/email])]
Sent: Mon 2/8/2010 5:16 AM
To: Mark Jefferson; John Clarke; ... ...; Owen Hoyes; diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com ([email]diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com[/email]); Jeffrey Clay; Rocketship
Cc: dc289; Garry Bledsoe; Jason K; Michael Sims; blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com ([email]blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com[/email])
Subject: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
I completely agree and I'd say that if anyone has doubts about their commitment to the game now would be the time to drop out. That way this should be the last replacement for a while.
Chochem
--- Den mån 2010-02-08 skrev Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])>:
[quote:b5147c8f3e]Från: Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])>
Ämne: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
Till: "Mark Jefferson" <markj18-at-gmail.com ([email]markj18-at-gmail.com[/email])>, "John Clarke" <john.c1arke-at-btinternet.com ([email]john.c1arke-at-btinternet.com[/email])>, "... ..." <ecommander0-at-hotmail.com ([email]ecommander0-at-hotmail.com[/email])>, "Owen Hoyes" <necaalor-at-gmail.com ([email]necaalor-at-gmail.com[/email])>, diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com ([email]diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com[/email]), "Jeffrey Clay" <jmc66-at-mac.com ([email]jmc66-at-mac.com[/email])>, "Pontus Strimling" <pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com ([email]pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com[/email])>
Kopia: dc289-at-diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc289-at-diplomaticcorp.com[/email]), "Garry Bledsoe" <kielmarch-at-hotmail.com ([email]kielmarch-at-hotmail.com[/email])>, "Jason K" <Githraine-at-yahoo.com ([email]Githraine-at-yahoo.com[/email])>, "Michael Sims" <mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net ([email]mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net[/email])>, blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com ([email]blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com[/email])
Datum: måndag 8 februari 2010 07.23
Hi All,
The way I see it, we have three
options:
1. Find a replacement and allow a
sufficient amount of time for him to meet and negotiate with
everyone.
2. Continue the game using some ad-hoc,
six-player rules.
3. Have someone propose a 6-way draw;
everyone signs up for new games and hopes for the
best.
I strongly favor option 1 and strongly disfavor
option 2. If anyone disagrees, now would be the time
to speak up. Feel free to e-mail me privately on this
matter.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 7, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Mark Jefferson
wrote:
Arn't there other options here? I mean
this is getting ridiculous. Please don't allow a
replacement that hasn't played a game yet. Perhaps
that would help?
Here's what I propose:
Delete Austria from the game. It's home SC
arn't counted for 5 years. That way his neighbors
don't have free SCs to immediately go after. I
guess France and England are the only ones that wouldn't
benefit from this though.
Or, what if we all submitted orders for Austria?
Whichever move order got the most would be what that unit
does? We keep doing this until a replacement is found
so we can keep the game going.
If a replacement is found soon please don't set the
deadline for another week. I'd say 48-72 hours.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:02 PM,
Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])>
wrote:
Hey guys,
Still no word from our Austrian player. I've got
no choice at this point but to seek a new player.
I've put the game back into recruiting mode.
Hopefully we'll find a replacement soon and can get
back to the game.
Matthew
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:b5147c8f3e]Hey guys,
Deadline's here and I'm still waiting for
Austrian orders. I'm invoking Austria's
one-time 24h grace period. You are all free to submit
new orders during this time.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:b5147c8f3e]Hi Folks,
[/quote:b5147c8f3e]
[quote:b5147c8f3e]This is your friendly 24h reminder for Fall 1901.
[/quote:b5147c8f3e] I'm still missing orders from England, France,
Italy, and Austria.
[quote:b5147c8f3e]In future turns, please consider submitting
[/quote:b5147c8f3e]preliminary orders as soon as is convenient. You can
always change them once you've had some time, and you
reduce your risk of NMR to zero.
[quote:b5147c8f3e]Cheers,
[/quote:b5147c8f3e]
[quote:b5147c8f3e]Matthew
[/quote:b5147c8f3e]
[/quote:b5147c8f3e]
__________________________________________________
Använder du Yahoo!?
Är du trött på spam? Yahoo! E-post har det bästa spamskyddet som finns
http://se.mail.yahoo.com
[/quote:b5147c8f3e] |
| DC289: Annoyed GM (dc289) FuzzyLogic Feb 08, 11:31 am |
Generally you will find some new players in any standard game (re001 on the open games page - it is typically the proving ground). Variants tend to draw vets. Many GM's run games that are invite-only. You'll discover these and other ways to get into higher caliber game as you get to know ppl.
Of those currently open,
* Ben's Sengoku game is a very experienced group, he's only allowing in reputable players. i.e. must have completed some games, and have minimal NMR's (not even looking at abandons, down to the NMR level). Join that one if you want to face some of the best. Complex game w some extra rules.
* I have my own personal Haven creation open, and to this one I'm not as strict as Ben, but I do have to at least have some conversation w all entrants to see if I think they're in it to the end.
* Charles' 1926 is another strong group, but may be full (not sure)
The standard game (re001) is the one game that we keep open for anyone to join. Others are in some cases more selective, other cases not - up to the individual GM.
-mike
From: Mark Jefferson [mailto:markj18-at-gmail.com]
Sent: Mon 2/8/2010 11:17 AM
To: Michael Sims
Cc: Pontus Strimling; John Clarke; ... ...; Owen Hoyes; diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com; Jeffrey Clay; Rocketship; dc289; Garry Bledsoe; Jason K; blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com
Subject: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
I admit waiting for a replacement and giving them a week is the only fair system. It kind of sucks though.
I don't favor drawing this game because whatever game we go to next is likely to have the same problems. Is there a game series that is only for players that have completed at least one game?
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Michael Sims <mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net ([email]mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net[/email])> wrote:
Hey guys,
Just watching quietly here as I help out finding new players for games that need them... It's actually good (in a way) that the quitters weed out early. Since you have Matthew running your game, and not some automated system, when things like this come up, at least you know that he is going to find a good group, and the game will eventually be "on". If any of you committed players want to join a second game in the mean time, you're welcome to do so. You may have to ask a GM to put you in the game if you're new and the system only lets you into 1 game at a time. Just so you arent holding here waiting forever for a game to start.
-mike
From: Pontus Strimling [mailto:pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com ([email]pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com[/email])]
Sent: Mon 2/8/2010 5:16 AM
To: Mark Jefferson; John Clarke; ... ...; Owen Hoyes; diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com ([email]diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com[/email]); Jeffrey Clay; Rocketship
Cc: dc289; Garry Bledsoe; Jason K; Michael Sims; blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com ([email]blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com[/email])
Subject: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
I completely agree and I'd say that if anyone has doubts about their commitment to the game now would be the time to drop out. That way this should be the last replacement for a while.
Chochem
--- Den mån 2010-02-08 skrev Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])>:
[quote:1c5b4be7b9]Från: Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])>
Ämne: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
Till: "Mark Jefferson" <markj18-at-gmail.com ([email]markj18-at-gmail.com[/email])>, "John Clarke" <john.c1arke-at-btinternet.com ([email]john.c1arke-at-btinternet.com[/email])>, "... ..." <ecommander0-at-hotmail.com ([email]ecommander0-at-hotmail.com[/email])>, "Owen Hoyes" <necaalor-at-gmail.com ([email]necaalor-at-gmail.com[/email])>, diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com ([email]diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com[/email]), "Jeffrey Clay" <jmc66-at-mac.com ([email]jmc66-at-mac.com[/email])>, "Pontus Strimling" <pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com ([email]pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com[/email])>
Kopia: dc289-at-diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc289-at-diplomaticcorp.com[/email]), "Garry Bledsoe" <kielmarch-at-hotmail.com ([email]kielmarch-at-hotmail.com[/email])>, "Jason K" <Githraine-at-yahoo.com ([email]Githraine-at-yahoo.com[/email])>, "Michael Sims" <mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net ([email]mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net[/email])>, blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com ([email]blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com[/email])
Datum: måndag 8 februari 2010 07.23
Hi All,
The way I see it, we have three
options:
1. Find a replacement and allow a
sufficient amount of time for him to meet and negotiate with
everyone.
2. Continue the game using some ad-hoc,
six-player rules.
3. Have someone propose a 6-way draw;
everyone signs up for new games and hopes for the
best.
I strongly favor option 1 and strongly disfavor
option 2. If anyone disagrees, now would be the time
to speak up. Feel free to e-mail me privately on this
matter.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 7, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Mark Jefferson
wrote:
Arn't there other options here? I mean
this is getting ridiculous. Please don't allow a
replacement that hasn't played a game yet. Perhaps
that would help?
Here's what I propose:
Delete Austria from the game. It's home SC
arn't counted for 5 years. That way his neighbors
don't have free SCs to immediately go after. I
guess France and England are the only ones that wouldn't
benefit from this though.
Or, what if we all submitted orders for Austria?
Whichever move order got the most would be what that unit
does? We keep doing this until a replacement is found
so we can keep the game going.
If a replacement is found soon please don't set the
deadline for another week. I'd say 48-72 hours.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:02 PM,
Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])>
wrote:
Hey guys,
Still no word from our Austrian player. I've got
no choice at this point but to seek a new player.
I've put the game back into recruiting mode.
Hopefully we'll find a replacement soon and can get
back to the game.
Matthew
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:1c5b4be7b9]Hey guys,
Deadline's here and I'm still waiting for
Austrian orders. I'm invoking Austria's
one-time 24h grace period. You are all free to submit
new orders during this time.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:1c5b4be7b9]Hi Folks,
[/quote:1c5b4be7b9]
[quote:1c5b4be7b9]This is your friendly 24h reminder for Fall 1901.
[/quote:1c5b4be7b9]I'm still missing orders from England, France,
Italy, and Austria.
[quote:1c5b4be7b9]In future turns, please consider submitting
[/quote:1c5b4be7b9]preliminary orders as soon as is convenient. You can
always change them once you've had some time, and you
reduce your risk of NMR to zero.
[quote:1c5b4be7b9]Cheers,
[/quote:1c5b4be7b9]
[quote:1c5b4be7b9]Matthew
[/quote:1c5b4be7b9]
[/quote:1c5b4be7b9]
__________________________________________________
Använder du Yahoo!?
Är du trött på spam? Yahoo! E-post har det bästa spamskyddet som finns
http://se.mail.yahoo.com
[/quote:1c5b4be7b9] |
| DC289: Annoyed GM (dc289) garry.bledsoe Feb 09, 02:02 pm |
I will join this one to get it back on track with no more issues. But you will need to give me a week to bend people to my will...er, I mean negotiate...
Let's make Matthew's rocket fly boys (girls).
Garry
Subject: RE: DC289: Annoyed GM
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:31:55 -0600
From: mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net
To: markj18-at-gmail.com
CC: pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com; john.c1arke-at-btinternet.com; ecommander0-at-hotmail.com; necaalor-at-gmail.com; diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com; jmc66-at-mac.com; rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com; dc289-at-diplomaticcorp.com; kielmarch-at-hotmail.com; githraine-at-yahoo.com; blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com
Generally you will find some new players in any standard game (re001 on the open games page - it is typically the proving ground). Variants tend to draw vets. Many GM's run games that are invite-only. You'll discover these and other ways to get into higher caliber game as you get to know ppl.
Of those currently open,
* Ben's Sengoku game is a very experienced group, he's only allowing in reputable players. i.e. must have completed some games, and have minimal NMR's (not even looking at abandons, down to the NMR level). Join that one if you want to face some of the best. Complex game w some extra rules.
* I have my own personal Haven creation open, and to this one I'm not as strict as Ben, but I do have to at least have some conversation w all entrants to see if I think they're in it to the end.
* Charles' 1926 is another strong group, but may be full (not sure)
The standard game (re001) is the one game that we keep open for anyone to join. Others are in some cases more selective, other cases not - up to the individual GM.
-mike
From: Mark Jefferson [mailto:markj18-at-gmail.com]
Sent: Mon 2/8/2010 11:17 AM
To: Michael Sims
Cc: Pontus Strimling; John Clarke; ... ...; Owen Hoyes; diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com; Jeffrey Clay; Rocketship; dc289; Garry Bledsoe; Jason K; blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com
Subject: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
I admit waiting for a replacement and giving them a week is the only fair system. It kind of sucks though.
I don't favor drawing this game because whatever game we go to next is likely to have the same problems. Is there a game series that is only for players that have completed at least one game?
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Michael Sims <mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net ([email]mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net[/email])> wrote:
Hey guys,
Just watching quietly here as I help out finding new players for games that need them... It's actually good (in a way) that the quitters weed out early. Since you have Matthew running your game, and not some automated system, when things like this come up, at least you know that he is going to find a good group, and the game will eventually be "on". If any of you committed players want to join a second game in the mean time, you're welcome to do so. You may have to ask a GM to put you in the game if you're new and the system only lets you into 1 game at a time. Just so you arent holding here waiting forever for a game to start.
-mike
From: Pontus Strimling [mailto:pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com ([email]pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com[/email])]
Sent: Mon 2/8/2010 5:16 AM
To: Mark Jefferson; John Clarke; ... ...; Owen Hoyes; diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com ([email]diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com[/email]); Jeffrey Clay; Rocketship
Cc: dc289; Garry Bledsoe; Jason K; Michael Sims; blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com ([email]blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com[/email])
Subject: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
I completely agree and I'd say that if anyone has doubts about their commitment to the game now would be the time to drop out. That way this should be the last replacement for a while.
Chochem
--- Den mån 2010-02-08 skrev Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])>:
[quote:7d81227a44]Från: Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])>
Ämne: Re: DC289: Annoyed GM
Till: "Mark Jefferson" <markj18-at-gmail.com ([email]markj18-at-gmail.com[/email])>, "John Clarke" <john.c1arke-at-btinternet.com ([email]john.c1arke-at-btinternet.com[/email])>, "... ..." <ecommander0-at-hotmail.com ([email]ecommander0-at-hotmail.com[/email])>, "Owen Hoyes" <necaalor-at-gmail.com ([email]necaalor-at-gmail.com[/email])>, diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com ([email]diplomacy-at-jeffreyk.com[/email]), "Jeffrey Clay" <jmc66-at-mac.com ([email]jmc66-at-mac.com[/email])>, "Pontus Strimling" <pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com ([email]pontusstrimling-at-yahoo.com[/email])>
Kopia: dc289-at-diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc289-at-diplomaticcorp.com[/email]), "Garry Bledsoe" <kielmarch-at-hotmail.com ([email]kielmarch-at-hotmail.com[/email])>, "Jason K" <Githraine-at-yahoo.com ([email]Githraine-at-yahoo.com[/email])>, "Michael Sims" <mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net ([email]mike-at-fuzzylogicllc.net[/email])>, blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com ([email]blom.fredrik-at-gmail.com[/email])
Datum: måndag 8 februari 2010 07.23
Hi All,
The way I see it, we have three
options:
1. Find a replacement and allow a
sufficient amount of time for him to meet and negotiate with
everyone.
2. Continue the game using some ad-hoc,
six-player rules.
3. Have someone propose a 6-way draw;
everyone signs up for new games and hopes for the
best.
I strongly favor option 1 and strongly disfavor
option 2. If anyone disagrees, now would be the time
to speak up. Feel free to e-mail me privately on this
matter.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 7, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Mark Jefferson
wrote:
Arn't there other options here? I mean
this is getting ridiculous. Please don't allow a
replacement that hasn't played a game yet. Perhaps
that would help?
Here's what I propose:
Delete Austria from the game. It's home SC
arn't counted for 5 years. That way his neighbors
don't have free SCs to immediately go after. I
guess France and England are the only ones that wouldn't
benefit from this though.
Or, what if we all submitted orders for Austria?
Whichever move order got the most would be what that unit
does? We keep doing this until a replacement is found
so we can keep the game going.
If a replacement is found soon please don't set the
deadline for another week. I'd say 48-72 hours.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:02 PM,
Rocketship <rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])>
wrote:
Hey guys,
Still no word from our Austrian player. I've got
no choice at this point but to seek a new player.
I've put the game back into recruiting mode.
Hopefully we'll find a replacement soon and can get
back to the game.
Matthew
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:7d81227a44]Hey guys,
Deadline's here and I'm still waiting for
Austrian orders. I'm invoking Austria's
one-time 24h grace period. You are all free to submit
new orders during this time.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:7d81227a44]Hi Folks,
[/quote:7d81227a44]
[quote:7d81227a44]This is your friendly 24h reminder for Fall 1901.
[/quote:7d81227a44] I'm still missing orders from England, France,
Italy, and Austria.
[quote:7d81227a44]In future turns, please consider submitting
[/quote:7d81227a44]preliminary orders as soon as is convenient. You can
always change them once you've had some time, and you
reduce your risk of NMR to zero.
[quote:7d81227a44]Cheers,
[/quote:7d81227a44]
[quote:7d81227a44]Matthew
[/quote:7d81227a44]
[/quote:7d81227a44]
__________________________________________________
Använder du Yahoo!?
Är du trött på spam? Yahoo! E-post har det bästa spamskyddet som finns
http://se.mail.yahoo.com
[/quote:7d81227a44]
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. |
| Dc 277: Winter 2001 Orders - AlanRFarrington (Feb 07, 2010, 9:37 pm) |
Winter 2001 Orders are due up Monday night at the usual time.
Lets get 'em in! Expect a short turnaround before next spring too because we've had all kinds of time since the last major turn.
--Alan
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.[Reply] |
| DC289: Annoyed GM - Rocketship (Feb 07, 2010, 8:02 pm) |
Hey guys,
Still no word from our Austrian player. I've got no choice at this point but to seek a new player. I've put the game back into recruiting mode.
Hopefully we'll find a replacement soon and can get back to the game.
Matthew
On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Rocketship wrote:
Hey guys,
Deadline's here and I'm still waiting for Austrian orders. I'm invoking Austria's one-time 24h grace period. You are all free to submit new orders during this time.
Cheers,
Matthew
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Rocketship wrote:
[quote:8326ccd16e]Hi Folks,
This is your friendly 24h reminder for Fall 1901. I'm still missing orders from England, France, Italy, and Austria.
In future turns, please consider submitting preliminary orders as soon as is convenient. You can always change them once you've had some time, and you reduce your risk of NMR to zero.
Cheers,
Matthew
[/quote:8326ccd16e][Reply] |
| DC 298 spring 05 reminder - untitled36 (Feb 07, 2010, 7:04 pm) |
hey all,
Just about 12 hours till deadline. I've got several sets of orders in, but I still am waiting on a couple. Make sure you have them in!!!
John
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now.[Reply] |
| DC 282, Fall 1904 - alwayshunted (Feb 07, 2010, 4:05 pm) |
Hey everyone,
Sorry for my tardiness. Another interesting turn.... we have a couple of retreats due, one from Russia and one from Italy. I'm making the deadline Tuesday, and there will possibly be some slow turns on my part for the next week. I'm taking a vacation and will be on a beach at a resort. The resort has internet apparently, but I'm not 100% sure how things will work.
Anyhow, I will do my best to get adjudications out for the autumn and winter turns in a timely manner.... in between rums.
Here is fall:
----------------------
ORDERS RECEIVED:
Austria:
A ALBANIA-TRIESTE
F GREECE-IONIAN SEA
A SERBIA supports A ALBANIA-TRIESTE
England:
F mao-west med
A ruh support French army mun
F kie support a ber
A ber hold
F bal support a ber
F swe-gulf of bothnia
F bar support a norway-stp
A Norway-stp (nc obviously)
F nts hold
France:
ANAf - Tun
FSpa SC SFMar - GoL
FMar - GoL
AMun SABer
AGas - Bur
Germany:
A(Pru) - War
Italy:
F Lyo Con A Pie - Tun
F Wmed Con A Pie - Tun
A Pie - Tun
F Ion S A Pie - Tun
Russia:
MOS - WAR
RUM HOLD
TRI S BUD
BUD S RUM
BOT HOLD
BOH - VIE
SIL - MUN
Turkey:
f sev - rum
a bul s f sev - rum
a arm - sev
a con s a bul
ADJUDICATION:
Austria:
A Albania - Trieste
F Greece - Ionian Sea (*Fails*)
A Serbia Supports A Albania - Trieste
England:
F Baltic Sea Supports A Berlin
F Barents Sea Supports A Norway - St Petersburg
A Berlin Hold
F Kiel Supports A Berlin
F Mid-Atlantic Ocean - Western Mediterranean (*Fails*)
F North Sea Hold
A Norway - St Petersburg
A Ruhr Supports A Munich
F Sweden - Gulf of Bothnia (*Fails*)
France:
A Gascony - Burgundy
F Marseilles - Gulf of Lyon
A Munich Supports A Berlin (*Cut*)
A North Africa - Tunis
F Spain(sc) Supports F Marseilles - Gulf of Lyon
Germany:
A Prussia - Warsaw (*Bounce*)
Italy:
F Gulf of Lyon Convoys A Piedmont - Tunis (*Dislodged*)
F Ionian Sea Supports A Piedmont - Tunis (*Cut*)
A Piedmont - Tunis (*Fails*)
F Western Mediterranean Convoys A Piedmont - Tunis
Russia:
A Bohemia - Vienna
A Budapest Supports F Rumania
F Gulf of Bothnia Hold
A Moscow - Warsaw (*Bounce*)
F Rumania Hold
A Silesia - Munich (*Fails*)
A Trieste Supports A Budapest (*Dislodged*)
Turkey:
A Armenia - Sevastopol (*Fails*)
A Bulgaria Supports F Sevastopol - Rumania
A Constantinople Supports A Bulgaria
F Sevastopol - Rumania (*Fails*)
RETREATS:
Italian F Gulf of Lyon can retreat to Tuscany or Tyrrhenian Sea.
Russian A Trieste can retreat to Tyrolia or Venice.
DEADLINE: Tuesday, February 9th, 17:00 MST.
-------------------------
Check my work and all that. Have fun.
Warren[Reply] |
| 1926 091119: Note - charlesf (Feb 07, 2010, 1:31 pm) |
I only just now noticed yesterday's mistake. Failed to name the right season in the header and hope nobody skipped the post believing it was some accidental duplicate.
Sorry about that.
Charles[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: The Swedish Cavalry has arrived! - charlesf (Feb 07, 2010, 1:05 pm) |
Hi guys,
I trust you share my relief that after the recent turmoil, Matt Kelly, a player who hasn't NMRed once in 13 games, has kindly stepped forward and taken over the Swedish realm.
In the interest of getting the game on track again, I'm scheduling the winter dealine for Tuesday, 6 PM CET. Unless anyone objects, I'll from this point onwards not go with the past Wednesday/Friday routine, but rather try to adhere to a Monday/Wednesday schedule.
Liebe Grüsse,
Charles
----------
PLAYERS:
AUSTRIA: Mike Hoffman <mrh(at)panix.com>
DENMARK-NORWAY: Marc Ellinger <mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com>
ENGLAND: Harvey Morris <hmtucaz(at)gmail.com>
FRANCE: Nigel Phillips <nephilli99(at)hotmail.com>
POLAND-LITHUANIA: Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com>
RUSSIA: Mikael Johansson <m_don_j(at)hotmail.com> (eliminated Winter 1650)
SPAIN: Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com>
SWEDEN: Matthew Kelly <kelly058(at)verizon.net ([email]kelly058(at)verizon.net[/email])> (joined Winter 1652)
TURKEY: Aidan Slattery <AiSlattery(at)aol.com>
PROCLAMATIONS:
o QUEEN CHRISTINA ABDICATES, CHARLES X CROWNED!
PRESS: None. 
ORDERS:
Austria:
A Hesse - Rhineland-Westphalia (*Fails*)
A Saxony Supports A Swabia (*Cut*)
A Swabia Supports A Hesse - Rhineland-Westphalia (*Dislodged*)
A Trieste Supports F Adriatic Sea - Venice (*Void*)
A Tyrolia - Switzerland (*Bounce*)
A Vienna Supports A Trieste
Denmark-Norway:
F Scania - Baltic Sea (*Fails*)
A Stettin - Mecklenburg (*Bounce*)
England:
A Bohuslan - Stockholm
A Karelia - Abo
F North Sea Hold
F Norwegian Sea Hold
F Skagerrak Supports A Bohuslan - Stockholm
F United Provinces Hold
France:
F Flanders Hold
F Helgoland Bight - Copenhagen (*Bounce*)
A Lombardy - Switzerland (*Bounce*)
A Lorraine Supports A Switzerland - Swabia
A Paris - Dauphiné
A Rhineland-Westphalia Supports A Switzerland - Swabia (*Cut*)
A Switzerland - Swabia
A Venice - Tyrolia (*Fails*)
Poland-Lithuania:
A Brandenburg - Mecklenburg (*Bounce*)
A Courland - Polotsk (*Dislodged*)
A Ingria Supports A Karelia - Abo
A Moscow - Smolensk
A Novgorod Supports A Moscow - Smolensk
A Prussia - Courland (*Fails*)
A Vilna Supports A Moscow - Smolensk
A Volhynia - White Ruthenia
Spain:
F Adriatic Sea - Dalmatia (*Bounce*)
A Algiers Supports F Western Mediterranean - Tunis (*Fails*)
A Lower Saxony - Saxony (*Fails*)
F Naples Supports F Papal States(ec) - Adriatic Sea (*Fails*)
F Papal States(ec) - Adriatic Sea (*Fails*)
A Portugal Hold
F Seville - Western Mediterranean (*Fails*)
A Tunis - Papal States (*Fails*)
F Tyrrhenian Sea Convoys A Tunis - Papal States
F Western Mediterranean - Tunis (*Fails*)
Sweden:
F Baltic Sea - Stettin (*Fails*)
F Gulf of Bothnia - Courland
A Holstein - Copenhagen (*Bounce*)
A Mecklenburg Supports F Baltic Sea - Stettin (*Cut*)
A Polotsk Supports A Smolensk - Vilna (*Cut*)
A Riga Supports F Gulf of Bothnia - Courland
A Smolensk - Vilna (*Dislodged*)
Turkey:
A Belgrade - Croatia
F Candia Supports F Eastern Mediterranean - Ionian Sea
F Constantinople - Illyria (*Fails*)
A Crimea Hold
F Eastern Mediterranean - Ionian Sea
F Egypt Supports F Eastern Mediterranean - Ionian Sea
F Illyria - Dalmatia (*Bounce*)
F Ionian Sea - Sicily
A Siberia Supports A Novgorod
Ukraine:
A Ukraine Hold
PENDING RETREATS:
Polish A Courland can retreat to Samogitia or OTB.
Swedish A Smolensk can retreat to Pskov or OTB.
Austrian A Swabia can retreat to Bavaria or OTB.
PENDING ADJUSTMENTS:
Austria:
Remove?
Denmark-Norway:
Remove
England:
Build
Build
France:
Build
Build
Poland-Lithuania:
Build?
Sweden:
Remove
Remove?
Turkey:
Build
SUPPLY CENTER OWNERSHIP:
Austria(6): Bavaria, Saxony, Swabia, Prague, Trieste, Vienna.
Denmark-Norway(2): Mecklenburg, Stockholm.
England(6): Bristol, Christiania, Ireland, London, Scotland, United Provinces.
France(: Brest, Flanders, Lorraine, Marseille, Paris, Savoy, Switzerland, Venice.
Poland-Lithuania(: Courland, Cracow, Crimea, Moscow, Prussia, Vilna, Voronezh, Warsaw.
Russia(0): -
Spain(10): Algiers, Lower Saxony, Madrid, Morocco, Naples, Portugal, Rhineland-Westphalia, Sevilla, Tuscany, Tunis.
Sweden(7): Abo, Brandenburg, Copenhagen, Holstein, Novgorod, Riga, Stettin.
Turkey(9): Belgrade, Candia, Constantinople, Damascus, Moldavia, Persia, Transylvania, Turkestan, Wallachia.
Minor Powers(2): Papal States, Ukraine.
DEADLINE SCHEDULE: (all orders are due NLT 6PM CET (i.e. GMT+1)...not local time)
o Winter 1652 Retreats/Adjustments: 5 January
o Spring 1653 Moves: ( 10 January
ORDERS MAP:
RESULTS MAP:[Reply] |
| dc294 Spring reminder - notasb (Feb 07, 2010, 11:09 am) |
Spring is due Monday Feb 8th 2 pm CST (GMT -6) 2000 GMT
If I haven't acknowledged your orders I haven't received them.
Christine
------------
History teaches us that many nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives. - Abba Eban
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.[Reply] |
| Face to Face Tournaments in Australia - deathblade_penguin (Feb 07, 2010, 5:31 am) |
Hey all,
If anyone is looking to play diplomacy face to face in australia, we have an upcoming tournament in Melbourne
Victorian Diplomacy Convention
Venue: The Melbourne Chess Club, 66 Leicester St, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC
Dates: 6-7 March 2010, Labour Day Longweekend (in Vic)
Format: Multiple rounds of Diplomacy over 2 days; ‘Best 3’ count.
First Prize: Return airfares & accommodation to The Hague, Netherlands, to attend World DipCon in August 2010. (Value A$3000)
Other Prizes: Best Countries, Best Novice, the Victorian Diplomacy Champion perpetual trophy (since 198
Cost: $20 for the whole weekend; no extra charge for entry to the Boardgames event. ($10/day casual play)
For more information, contact Tristan totalhomicide(at)gmail.com[Reply] |
| welcome - Kenshi777 (Feb 07, 2010, 2:10 am) |
welcome to the group, if I may be so bold, I think you've found the best place to play Diplomacy anywhere on the internet...
B.[Reply] |
| Belated Introduction - Sean2010 (Feb 06, 2010, 8:26 pm) |
Hello, I'm Sean2010.
I joined not too long ago, and I'm presently playing for first game at the website.
I've been playing Diplomacy for about 13 years or so.
It all began after personal issues, and my uncle and I played a series of "Stratego" games. At first, my uncle began with the esteem boosting method of gameplay unaware that during my personal issues; a group of friends and I had been playing religiously. After this first couple of games, as my uncle puts it when he tells the story; I began getting cocky and he futily attempted knocking me down a peg. We had played something like 6 games that night, and I had bested him 4 out of 6.
On Sunday, I typically worked for my uncle doing odd jobs and such, and he began telling me about "Diplomacy" and how my oldest uncle, on my father's side, and him played 1 on 1 diplomacy games.
After a couple of games, I got my own board and had gotten into postal gameplay before I ended up playing an e-mail modern game, and ended playing at another internet site where I was told about this site.
When I told my uncle about it, his initial response had been, "I've created a monster".
Sean2010.[Reply] |
| welcome (Community) Kenshi777 Feb 07, 02:10 am |
welcome to the group, if I may be so bold, I think you've found the best place to play Diplomacy anywhere on the internet...
B. |
| DCI f09 results! - FuzzyLogic (Feb 06, 2010, 3:51 pm) |
Things are looking pretty scary here for a few powers!
NEXT: Just a couple orders from Mikael and Joe are due Monday 3pm Central.
RETREATS:
Italian A Ven to Tus or Apu
BUILDS:
France: Build 2
Italy: Remove 1
Austria:
A Bohemia - Vienna (*Fails*)
A Serbia - Bulgaria (*Fails*)
A Trieste Supports A Vienna - Budapest
A Vienna - Budapest (*Bounce*)
France:
F Adriatic Sea - Ionian Sea
F Albania Supports F Ionian Sea - Greece
F Belgium - English Channel (*Bounce*)
A Burgundy - Ruhr
F Ionian Sea - Greece
A Munich Supports A Tyrolia
A Piedmont - Venice
A Tuscany - Rome
A Tyrolia Supports A Piedmont - Venice
F Tyrrhenian Sea Supports A Tuscany - Rome
F Wales - English Channel (*Bounce*)
Italy:
F Apulia - Naples
A Venice - Rome (*Dislodged*)
Russia:
F Black Sea Convoys A Sevastopol - Ankara
A Rumania - Budapest (*Bounce*)
A Sevastopol - Ankara
Turkey:
F Aegean Sea - Greece (*Fails*)
F Bulgaria(sc) Supports F Aegean Sea - Greece (*Cut*)
F Eastern Mediterranean - Aegean Sea (*Fails*)
Norway:
F Baltic Sea Hold
F Berlin - Kiel
A Denmark Hold
A Galicia Supports A Rumania - Budapest
A Kiel - Holland
F London Hold
A Moscow Supports A Ukraine
F North Sea - Helgoland Bight
A Silesia - Bohemia (*Fails*)
A Ukraine Supports A Galicia
A Warsaw - Silesia (*Fails*)[Reply] |
| 1926 091119: Spring 1928 Moves - charlesf (Feb 06, 2010, 2:21 pm) |
Hi guys,
I guess the Duce will be considerably relieved that the Reichswehr has retreated northwards.
Remember to submit your prelims no later than Tuesday, 6 PM CET. Happy dipping!
Liebe Grüsse,
Charles
----------
PLAYERS:
BRITAIN: Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com>
FRANCE: Darryl Good <dipknight(at)gmail.com> (joined Spring 192
GERMANY: Matt Kremer <matthew.kremer(at)yale.edu>
ITALY: Gregory Bim-Merle <gbimmerle(at)gmail.com> (joined Winter 1927)
POLAND: Wladimir Mysonski <wmysonski(at)gmail.com>
SOVIET UNION: Mikael Johansson <m_don_j(at)hotmail.com>
TURKEY: Harvey Morris <hmtucaz(at)gmail.com>
HEADLINES:
o GERMANS WITHDRAW TO NEW DEFENSIVE POSITIONS
RETREATS:
Germany:
A Austria - Czechia
F Hamburg - Berlin
A Switzerland - Lorraine
SUPPLY CENTER OWNERSHIP:
Britain(7): Belgium, Edinburgh, Egypt, Liverpool, London, Spain, Suez.
France(5): Algiers, Brest, Marseille, Paris, Tripoli.
Germany(6): Austria, Berlin, Czechia, Hamburg, Munich, Switzerland.
Italy(4): Milan, Naples, Rome, Yugoslavia.
Poland(: Cracow, Gdynia, Latvia, Leningrad, Lithuania, Moscow, Rumania, Warsaw.
Turkey(: Ankara, Beirut, Bulgaria, Greece, Iraq, Istanbul, Izmir, Stalingrad.
USSR(3): Denmark, Finland, Sweden.
Minor Powers(6): Hungary, Morocco, Netherlands, Norway, Persia, Portugal.
DEADLINE SCHEDULE: (all orders are due NLT 6PM CET (GMT+1)...not local time)
o Fall 1928 Moves: (9) 11 February
o Winter 1928 Retreats/Adjustments: 13 February
o Spring 1929 Moves: (16) 18 February
MAP:[Reply] |
| DC290 GAME START!! - bobbarkerfan1 (Feb 06, 2010, 1:57 pm) |
Hey everybody. Hope you are all ready to go because this thing is under way! I was able to get everyone one of their top choices, so this should be a good game for everybody. And thank you for the input regarding deadlines. I will make sure to not have Monday deadlines, and in April, I will make all the deadlines between Tuesday and Thursday. For those of you anticipating to be absent for extended periods of time, let me know about a week in advance when you would like the deadlines "to be or not to be." With all of that being said, I wish you all the best of luck and hope this game turns out great!
DEADLINE:
The spring 1901 deadline will be ***Saturday, February 13th, 9:00pm EST*** I will make every deadline 9:00pm EST as to remain consistant with this game and my other game. If this is a problem for anyone let me know. I advise you, if you live in a different time zone, to find out when this is for you or to ask me so you know exactly when you need orders in by. I am almost always on time sending out adjudications, so if you think you will need extra time, let me know BEFORE the deadline and I'll extend it as need be.
PLAYERS:
Ctry : Italy
Name : Alex Maslow
Email : Blueraider0-at-gmail.com ([email]Blueraider0-at-gmail.com[/email])
Ctry : England
Name : Kyle Rudge
Email : krudge-at-goldenwestradio.com ([email]krudge-at-goldenwestradio.com[/email])
Ctry : Russia
Name : Justin Card
Email : justin-at-darkenedpath.com ([email]justin-at-darkenedpath.com[/email])
Ctry : France
Name : John Smith
Email : midnightgreendip-at-gmail.com ([email]midnightgreendip-at-gmail.com[/email])
Ctry : Austria
Name : Joe Rizzo
Email : kangaroohp-at-aol.com ([email]kangaroohp-at-aol.com[/email])
Ctry : Germany
Name : Matthew Stevenson
Email : rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com ([email]rocketship.rocketship-at-gmail.com[/email])
Ctry : Turkey
Name : Michael Walters
Email : michael.alan.walters-at-gmail.com ([email]michael.alan.walters-at-gmail.com[/email])
Just a sidenote, I will be sending out .dpy and .gif files of the map, if you would like any other format please ask me. Once again, good luck, and get those orders in! and feel free to send orders in whenever and ask questions whenever,
Joey[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - hmtucaz (Feb 06, 2010, 1:36 pm) |
Charles -
I echo Dirk's comments.
Harvey
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
Charles,
Speaking only for myself, the frustration is a product of your not being forthcoming with the reasons-why there are delays. While on one hand it is thoughtful to protect a struggling player on the other it creates uncertainty and anxiety for the others as there are frequent starts and stops. If rationale around delays were accompanied by targeted restart times this would have made the troubles this game has had much less disruptive.
If you are willing and able to GM in your historically punctual manner and we have a full slate of dedicated players I would prefer to continue. However given that, apparently, the new Sweden has contacted literally no one it seems we are a ways from getting toward being on track.
Dirk
From: charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email]) [mailto:charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 1:46 PM
To: dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); 'Harvey Morris'; 'Jorge Saralegui'
Cc: 'Marc Ellinger'; 'Nigel PHILLIPS'; gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); aislattery(at)aol.com ([email]aislattery(at)aol.com[/email]); 'Mikael Johansson'; 'Mike Leprecaun'
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
Guys,
as it so happens, our replacement failed to submit orders. Despite my repeated warnings to him.
Such is the risk of taking on a newbie to the site.
Since I wanted to give him a chance to explain himself, I did not detail in my earlier note to you the reason for this delay. I was all set yesterday to get the adjucation out. Hoping for a last-minute arrival of Sweden's orders.
Believe me, this frustrates me as much as it does you.
I was hoping to have this game back on a smooth track. While I admittedly dragged my feet in getting a replacement, I don't see how I can be faulted here. I am committed to running this game smoothly to its conclusion. But if you guys want to end this in another way, that's your choice.
Charles
[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - charlesf (Feb 06, 2010, 1:33 pm) |
Jorge's memory serves me better than mine. Nick was involved in a truly massive number of games and simply couldn't keep up.
With regard to Nick, the original Austrian leader, my understanding is that Charles did not ask him to leave. There's little doubt that a player not talking in a game based on talking whose position is in the center of the map is doing the overall game a disservice. I was certainly not happy with it, and neither were at least some of the other players. When Charles inquired to Nick about his unusual lack of engagement, Nick replied that RL had overwhelmed him and he was sticking with the game only out of minimal commitment. Charles then offered to replace him, and Nick accepted, with very graceful apologies to all.
[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - dknemeyer (Feb 06, 2010, 1:31 pm) |
Charles,
Speaking only for myself, the frustration is a product of your not being forthcoming with the reasons-why there are delays. While on one hand it is thoughtful to protect a struggling player on the other it creates uncertainty and anxiety for the others as there are frequent starts and stops. If rationale around delays were accompanied by targeted restart times this would have made the troubles this game has had much less disruptive.
If you are willing and able to GM in your historically punctual manner and we have a full slate of dedicated players I would prefer to continue. However given that, apparently, the new Sweden has contacted literally no one it seems we are a ways from getting toward being on track.
Dirk
From: charlesf(at)web.de [mailto:charlesf(at)web.de]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 1:46 PM
To: dirk(at)knemeyer.com; 'Harvey Morris'; 'Jorge Saralegui'
Cc: 'Marc Ellinger'; 'Nigel PHILLIPS'; gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com; dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com; aislattery(at)aol.com; 'Mikael Johansson'; 'Mike Leprecaun'
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
Guys,
as it so happens, our replacement failed to submit orders. Despite my repeated warnings to him.
Such is the risk of taking on a newbie to the site.
Since I wanted to give him a chance to explain himself, I did not detail in my earlier note to you the reason for this delay. I was all set yesterday to get the adjucation out. Hoping for a last-minute arrival of Sweden's orders.
Believe me, this frustrates me as much as it does you.
I was hoping to have this game back on a smooth track. While I admittedly dragged my feet in getting a replacement, I don't see how I can be faulted here. I am committed to running this game smoothly to its conclusion. But if you guys want to end this in another way, that's your choice.
Charles[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - txurce (Feb 06, 2010, 1:03 pm) |
With regard to Nick, the original Austrian leader, my understanding is that Charles did not ask him to leave. There's little doubt that a player not talking in a game based on talking whose position is in the center of the map is doing the overall game a disservice. I was certainly not happy with it, and neither were at least some of the other players. When Charles inquired to Nick about his unusual lack of engagement, Nick replied that RL had overwhelmed him and he was sticking with the game only out of minimal commitment. Charles then offered to replace him, and Nick accepted, with very graceful apologies to all.
I'm glad to hear from Charles as to why there was no adjudication, which certainly isn't his fault. That said, after having revived myself for Gabriele, I'm not looking forward to another delay in a game seemingly headed for stalemate anyway. I would reluctantly prefer to end the game with a DIAS.
Jorge
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Nigel PHILLIPS <nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email])> wrote:
FWIW, I was annoyed at the manner of austria's departure, and discussed with Dirk and Harvey my concern sat that stage, and was persuaded to carry on. From what I remember it seemed to me that Charles was imposing a style of play as a requirement on someone who was submitting moves, but not talking. I prefer conversations with other players, but don't see silence as areason for a player to be expelled. But I may be mis-remembering or misinterpreting. i am enjoying the actual play, and the variant and players. I'd happily try it again. I am reluctant to have the dias, because I'd love to see how the game might turn out, (will austria fall? will there be a mass stalemate in the centre?) but I wouldn't continue it with so many wishing to end it, so I wouldn't block the dias. I don't always understand Charles' messages, or share his reasoning
Nigs
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:09:24 -0700
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
From: hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email])
To: dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])
CC: jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email]); mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com ([email]mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com[/email]); nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email]); charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email]); gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); aislattery(at)aol.com ([email]aislattery(at)aol.com[/email]); m_don_j(at)hotmail.com ([email]m_don_j(at)hotmail.com[/email]); mrh(at)panix.com ([email]mrh(at)panix.com[/email])
Everyone -
OK. I, too, vote for DIAS.
Time to move on.
Harvey
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
[quote:513618bd74]
Hi Harvey,
For me, I try hard and take pride in always getting my turns in and completing my games. "Abandoning" a game is not something I would be happy with, personally. I would be fine either with a DIAS, or the game being disbanded like it never happened, or if Charles' real-life situation enables a timely resolution of the game.
FWIW while certainly annoyed at the game I am not upset with Charles, per se: I'm sure it is a case of good intentions gone awry thanks to real-life. That said, I would like to move on.
Dirk
From: Harvey Morris [mailto:hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email])]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 11:49 AM
To: Jorge Saralegui
Cc: Dirk Knemeyer; Marc Ellinger; Nigel PHILLIPS; charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email]); gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); aislattery(at)aol.com ([email]aislattery(at)aol.com[/email]); Mikael Johansson; Mike Leprecaun
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
Everyone -
My two cents.
I have never resigned from a game, and have never gone absent.
As some of you know, a week or two ago I wrote Charles to say that I was on the verge of resigning from this game. That apparently prompted him to find a replacement for Sweden.
I am absolutely puzzled (and pissed) by Charles' newest message. This is a Winter Adjustment Phase. What the heck is there to adjudicate?
Please, talk to me about the merits of DIAS versus mass resignation from the game.
Regards to all from an angry Harvey
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])> wrote:
I would officially vote Yes for a DIAS, even though it deprives Nigs of his shot at the crown of the HRE. Sometimes we have to make sacrifices for the greater good.
Jorge
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
I agree with the general sentiment. It appears Charles is struggling with time a little bit. I formally propose and vote yes for a DIAS. This way he can be free of the adjudication responsibility and we can find other games.
Dirk
On Feb 6, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Marc Ellinger wrote:
I concur that I would like to have it be smoother. (Even in my poor position!)
Marc.
Marc H. Ellinger, CPA
Attorney at Law
Blitz, Bardgett & Deutsch, LC
308 East High Street, Suite 301
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
(573) 634-2500
(573) 634-3358 (Facsimile) The information transmitted in this e-mail message is intended only for the addressee and may contain CONFIDENTIAL and/or PRIVILEGED material. Any interception, review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is UNAUTHORIZED, prohibited by law and may subject such users to criminal or civil penalty. If you received this communication in error, please (1) contact the sender above; (2) advise Blitz, Bardgett & Deutsch of such receipt; and (3) delete the communication completely from your computer or network system.
PLEASE NOTE: The Missouri Bar Disciplinary Counsel requires all Missouri lawyers to notify all recipients of e-mail that (1) e-mail communication is not a secure method of communication, (2) any e-mail that is sent to you or by you may be copied and held by various computers it passes through as it goes from me to you or vice versa, (3) persons not participating in our communication may intercept our communications by improperly accessing your computer or my computer or even some computer unconnected to either of us which the e-mail passed through. I am communicating to you via e-mail because you have consented to receive communications via this medium. If you change your mind and want future communications to be sent in a different fashion, please let me know AT ONCE.
From: Nigel PHILLIPS [mailto:nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email])]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 9:56 AM
To: Jorge England 214; charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])
Cc: gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); aislattery(at)aol.com ([email]aislattery(at)aol.com[/email]); dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); Mikael Johansson; hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email]); Marc Ellinger; Mike Leprecaun
Subject: RE: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
I do get confused by some of Charles' more enigmatic messages, and austria's leaving the game seemed to be because he wasn't playing as Charles wanted him too, in a communicative manner. I find non-communication unsocial, but not a reason for leaving a game by itself.
I would like to get a move on though
Nigs
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 07:39:47 -0800
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
From: jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])
To: charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])
CC: gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); AiSlattery(at)aol.com ([email]AiSlattery(at)aol.com[/email]); dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); m_don_j(at)hotmail.com ([email]m_don_j(at)hotmail.com[/email]); nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email]); hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email]); mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com ([email]mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com[/email]); mrh(at)panix.com ([email]mrh(at)panix.com[/email])
To all,
Harvey and I have already discussed our own dissatisfaction with the delays in this game. How does everyone else feel about it?
Jorge
2010/2/6 Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])>
Hi Harvey,
What do you think? This is starting to turn into a joke.
Jorge
2010/2/6 Charles Féaux de la Croix <charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])> [quote:513618bd74]
Hi guys,
I shall not be adjucating right now. I hope that I shall be able to do so before too long.
Charles
Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us now
[/quote:513618bd74]
Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us now
[/quote:513618bd74][Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - charlesf (Feb 06, 2010, 12:54 pm) |
FWIW, I was annoyed at the manner of austria's departure, and discussed with Dirk and Harvey my concern sat that stage, and was persuaded to carry on.
Nigs, your annoyance is balanced by the annoyance of others at his gunboating.
My policy was clear on that count. In any case, it's one of those issues you'd rather not have come up. Naturally, I don't begrudge you being less enthralled about that step. Fair enough.
Charles[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - charlesf (Feb 06, 2010, 12:46 pm) |
Guys,
as it so happens, our replacement failed to submit orders. Despite my repeated warnings to him.
Such is the risk of taking on a newbie to the site.
Since I wanted to give him a chance to explain himself, I did not detail in my earlier note to you the reason for this delay. I was all set yesterday to get the adjucation out. Hoping for a last-minute arrival of Sweden's orders.
Believe me, this frustrates me as much as it does you.
I was hoping to have this game back on a smooth track. While I admittedly dragged my feet in getting a replacement, I don't see how I can be faulted here. I am committed to running this game smoothly to its conclusion. But if you guys want to end this in another way, that's your choice.
Charles[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - Nigs (Feb 06, 2010, 12:38 pm) |
FWIW, I was annoyed at the manner of austria's departure, and discussed with Dirk and Harvey my concern sat that stage, and was persuaded to carry on. From what I remember it seemed to me that Charles was imposing a style of play as a requirement on someone who was submitting moves, but not talking. I prefer conversations with other players, but don't see silence as areason for a player to be expelled. But I may be mis-remembering or misinterpreting. i am enjoying the actual play, and the variant and players. I'd happily try it again. I am reluctant to have the dias, because I'd love to see how the game might turn out, (will austria fall? will there be a mass stalemate in the centre?) but I wouldn't continue it with so many wishing to end it, so I wouldn't block the dias. I don't always understand Charles' messages, or share his reasoning
Nigs
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:09:24 -0700
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
From: hmtucaz(at)gmail.com
To: dirk(at)knemeyer.com
CC: jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com; mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com; nephilli99(at)hotmail.com; charlesf(at)web.de; gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com; dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com; aislattery(at)aol.com; m_don_j(at)hotmail.com; mrh(at)panix.com
Everyone -
OK. I, too, vote for DIAS.
Time to move on.
Harvey
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
Hi Harvey,
For me, I try hard and take pride in always getting my turns in and completing my games. "Abandoning" a game is not something I would be happy with, personally. I would be fine either with a DIAS, or the game being disbanded like it never happened, or if Charles' real-life situation enables a timely resolution of the game.
FWIW while certainly annoyed at the game I am not upset with Charles, per se: I'm sure it is a case of good intentions gone awry thanks to real-life. That said, I would like to move on.
Dirk
From: Harvey Morris [mailto:hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email])]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 11:49 AM
To: Jorge Saralegui
Cc: Dirk Knemeyer; Marc Ellinger; Nigel PHILLIPS; charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email]); gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); aislattery(at)aol.com ([email]aislattery(at)aol.com[/email]); Mikael Johansson; Mike Leprecaun
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
Everyone -
My two cents.
I have never resigned from a game, and have never gone absent.
As some of you know, a week or two ago I wrote Charles to say that I was on the verge of resigning from this game. That apparently prompted him to find a replacement for Sweden.
I am absolutely puzzled (and pissed) by Charles' newest message. This is a Winter Adjustment Phase. What the heck is there to adjudicate?
Please, talk to me about the merits of DIAS versus mass resignation from the game.
Regards to all from an angry Harvey
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])> wrote:
I would officially vote Yes for a DIAS, even though it deprives Nigs of his shot at the crown of the HRE. Sometimes we have to make sacrifices for the greater good.
Jorge
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
I agree with the general sentiment. It appears Charles is struggling with time a little bit. I formally propose and vote yes for a DIAS. This way he can be free of the adjudication responsibility and we can find other games.
Dirk
On Feb 6, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Marc Ellinger wrote:
I concur that I would like to have it be smoother. (Even in my poor position!)
Marc.
Marc H. Ellinger, CPA
Attorney at Law
Blitz, Bardgett & Deutsch, LC
308 East High Street, Suite 301
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
(573) 634-2500
(573) 634-3358 (Facsimile) The information transmitted in this e-mail message is intended only for the addressee and may contain CONFIDENTIAL and/or PRIVILEGED material. Any interception, review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is UNAUTHORIZED, prohibited by law and may subject such users to criminal or civil penalty. If you received this communication in error, please (1) contact the sender above; (2) advise Blitz, Bardgett & Deutsch of such receipt; and (3) delete the communication completely from your computer or network system.
PLEASE NOTE: The Missouri Bar Disciplinary Counsel requires all Missouri lawyers to notify all recipients of e-mail that (1) e-mail communication is not a secure method of communication, (2) any e-mail that is sent to you or by you may be copied and held by various computers it passes through as it goes from me to you or vice versa, (3) persons not participating in our communication may intercept our communications by improperly accessing your computer or my computer or even some computer unconnected to either of us which the e-mail passed through. I am communicating to you via e-mail because you have consented to receive communications via this medium. If you change your mind and want future communications to be sent in a different fashion, please let me know AT ONCE.
From: Nigel PHILLIPS [mailto:nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email])]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 9:56 AM
To: Jorge England 214; charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])
Cc: gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); aislattery(at)aol.com ([email]aislattery(at)aol.com[/email]); dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); Mikael Johansson; hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email]); Marc Ellinger; Mike Leprecaun
Subject: RE: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
I do get confused by some of Charles' more enigmatic messages, and austria's leaving the game seemed to be because he wasn't playing as Charles wanted him too, in a communicative manner. I find non-communication unsocial, but not a reason for leaving a game by itself.
I would like to get a move on though
Nigs
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 07:39:47 -0800
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
From: jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])
To: charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])
CC: gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); AiSlattery(at)aol.com ([email]AiSlattery(at)aol.com[/email]); dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); m_don_j(at)hotmail.com ([email]m_don_j(at)hotmail.com[/email]); nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email]); hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email]); mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com ([email]mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com[/email]); mrh(at)panix.com ([email]mrh(at)panix.com[/email])
To all,
Harvey and I have already discussed our own dissatisfaction with the delays in this game. How does everyone else feel about it?
Jorge
2010/2/6 Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])>
Hi Harvey,
What do you think? This is starting to turn into a joke.
Jorge
2010/2/6 Charles Féaux de la Croix <charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])> [quote:be71760581]
Hi guys,
I shall not be adjucating right now. I hope that I shall be able to do so before too long.
Charles
Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us now
[/quote:be71760581]
Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us now[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - hmtucaz (Feb 06, 2010, 11:09 am) |
Everyone -
OK. I, too, vote for DIAS.
Time to move on.
Harvey
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
Hi Harvey,
For me, I try hard and take pride in always getting my turns in and completing my games. "Abandoning" a game is not something I would be happy with, personally. I would be fine either with a DIAS, or the game being disbanded like it never happened, or if Charles' real-life situation enables a timely resolution of the game.
FWIW while certainly annoyed at the game I am not upset with Charles, per se: I'm sure it is a case of good intentions gone awry thanks to real-life. That said, I would like to move on.
Dirk
From: Harvey Morris [mailto:hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email])]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 11:49 AM
To: Jorge Saralegui
Cc: Dirk Knemeyer; Marc Ellinger; Nigel PHILLIPS; charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email]); gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); aislattery(at)aol.com ([email]aislattery(at)aol.com[/email]); Mikael Johansson; Mike Leprecaun
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
Everyone -
My two cents.
I have never resigned from a game, and have never gone absent.
As some of you know, a week or two ago I wrote Charles to say that I was on the verge of resigning from this game. That apparently prompted him to find a replacement for Sweden.
I am absolutely puzzled (and pissed) by Charles' newest message. This is a Winter Adjustment Phase. What the heck is there to adjudicate?
Please, talk to me about the merits of DIAS versus mass resignation from the game.
Regards to all from an angry Harvey
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])> wrote:
I would officially vote Yes for a DIAS, even though it deprives Nigs of his shot at the crown of the HRE. Sometimes we have to make sacrifices for the greater good.
Jorge
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
I agree with the general sentiment. It appears Charles is struggling with time a little bit. I formally propose and vote yes for a DIAS. This way he can be free of the adjudication responsibility and we can find other games.
Dirk
On Feb 6, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Marc Ellinger wrote:
I concur that I would like to have it be smoother. (Even in my poor position!)
Marc.
Marc H. Ellinger, CPA
Attorney at Law
Blitz, Bardgett & Deutsch, LC
308 East High Street, Suite 301
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
(573) 634-2500
(573) 634-3358 (Facsimile)
The information transmitted in this e-mail message is intended only for the addressee and may contain CONFIDENTIAL and/or PRIVILEGED material. Any interception, review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is UNAUTHORIZED, prohibited by law and may subject such users to criminal or civil penalty. If you received this communication in error, please (1) contact the sender above; (2) advise Blitz, Bardgett & Deutsch of such receipt; and (3) delete the communication completely from your computer or network system.
PLEASE NOTE: The Missouri Bar Disciplinary Counsel requires all Missouri lawyers to notify all recipients of e-mail that (1) e-mail communication is not a secure method of communication, (2) any e-mail that is sent to you or by you may be copied and held by various computers it passes through as it goes from me to you or vice versa, (3) persons not participating in our communication may intercept our communications by improperly accessing your computer or my computer or even some computer unconnected to either of us which the e-mail passed through. I am communicating to you via e-mail because you have consented to receive communications via this medium. If you change your mind and want future communications to be sent in a different fashion, please let me know AT ONCE.
From: Nigel PHILLIPS [mailto:nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email])]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 9:56 AM
To: Jorge England 214; charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])
Cc: gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); aislattery(at)aol.com ([email]aislattery(at)aol.com[/email]); dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); Mikael Johansson; hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email]); Marc Ellinger; Mike Leprecaun
Subject: RE: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
I do get confused by some of Charles' more enigmatic messages, and austria's leaving the game seemed to be because he wasn't playing as Charles wanted him too, in a communicative manner. I find non-communication unsocial, but not a reason for leaving a game by itself.
I would like to get a move on though
Nigs
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 07:39:47 -0800
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
From: jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])
To: charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])
CC: gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); AiSlattery(at)aol.com ([email]AiSlattery(at)aol.com[/email]); dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); m_don_j(at)hotmail.com ([email]m_don_j(at)hotmail.com[/email]); nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email]); hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email]); mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com ([email]mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com[/email]); mrh(at)panix.com ([email]mrh(at)panix.com[/email])
To all,
Harvey and I have already discussed our own dissatisfaction with the delays in this game. How does everyone else feel about it?
Jorge
2010/2/6 Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])>
Hi Harvey,
What do you think? This is starting to turn into a joke.
Jorge
2010/2/6 Charles Féaux de la Croix <charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])> [quote:e60c5b0218]
Hi guys,
I shall not be adjucating right now. I hope that I shall be able to do so before too long.
Charles
Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us now
[/quote:e60c5b0218][Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - dknemeyer (Feb 06, 2010, 11:00 am) |
Hi Harvey,
For me, I try hard and take pride in always getting my turns in and completing my games. "Abandoning" a game is not something I would be happy with, personally. I would be fine either with a DIAS, or the game being disbanded like it never happened, or if Charles' real-life situation enables a timely resolution of the game.
FWIW while certainly annoyed at the game I am not upset with Charles, per se: I'm sure it is a case of good intentions gone awry thanks to real-life. That said, I would like to move on.
Dirk
From: Harvey Morris [mailto:hmtucaz(at)gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 11:49 AM
To: Jorge Saralegui
Cc: Dirk Knemeyer; Marc Ellinger; Nigel PHILLIPS; charlesf(at)web.de; gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com; dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com; aislattery(at)aol.com; Mikael Johansson; Mike Leprecaun
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
Everyone -
My two cents.
I have never resigned from a game, and have never gone absent.
As some of you know, a week or two ago I wrote Charles to say that I was on the verge of resigning from this game. That apparently prompted him to find a replacement for Sweden.
I am absolutely puzzled (and pissed) by Charles' newest message. This is a Winter Adjustment Phase. What the heck is there to adjudicate?
Please, talk to me about the merits of DIAS versus mass resignation from the game.
Regards to all from an angry Harvey
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])> wrote:
I would officially vote Yes for a DIAS, even though it deprives Nigs of his shot at the crown of the HRE. Sometimes we have to make sacrifices for the greater good.
Jorge
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
I agree with the general sentiment. It appears Charles is struggling with time a little bit. I formally propose and vote yes for a DIAS. This way he can be free of the adjudication responsibility and we can find other games.
Dirk
On Feb 6, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Marc Ellinger wrote:
I concur that I would like to have it be smoother. (Even in my poor position!)
Marc.
Marc H. Ellinger, CPA
Attorney at Law
Blitz, Bardgett & Deutsch, LC
308 East High Street, Suite 301
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
(573) 634-2500
(573) 634-3358 (Facsimile)
The information transmitted in this e-mail message is intended only for the addressee and may contain CONFIDENTIAL and/or PRIVILEGED material. Any interception, review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is UNAUTHORIZED, prohibited by law and may subject such users to criminal or civil penalty. If you received this communication in error, please (1) contact the sender above; (2) advise Blitz, Bardgett & Deutsch of such receipt; and (3) delete the communication completely from your computer or network system.
PLEASE NOTE: The Missouri Bar Disciplinary Counsel requires all Missouri lawyers to notify all recipients of e-mail that (1) e-mail communication is not a secure method of communication, (2) any e-mail that is sent to you or by you may be copied and held by various computers it passes through as it goes from me to you or vice versa, (3) persons not participating in our communication may intercept our communications by improperly accessing your computer or my computer or even some computer unconnected to either of us which the e-mail passed through. I am communicating to you via e-mail because you have consented to receive communications via this medium. If you change your mind and want future communications to be sent in a different fashion, please let me know AT ONCE.
From: Nigel PHILLIPS [mailto:nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email])]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 9:56 AM
To: Jorge England 214; charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])
Cc: gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); aislattery(at)aol.com ([email]aislattery(at)aol.com[/email]); dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); Mikael Johansson; hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email]); Marc Ellinger; Mike Leprecaun
Subject: RE: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
I do get confused by some of Charles' more enigmatic messages, and austria's leaving the game seemed to be because he wasn't playing as Charles wanted him too, in a communicative manner. I find non-communication unsocial, but not a reason for leaving a game by itself.
I would like to get a move on though
Nigs
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 07:39:47 -0800
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
From: jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])
To: charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])
CC: gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]); AiSlattery(at)aol.com ([email]AiSlattery(at)aol.com[/email]); dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); m_don_j(at)hotmail.com ([email]m_don_j(at)hotmail.com[/email]); nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email]); hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email]); mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com ([email]mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com[/email]); mrh(at)panix.com ([email]mrh(at)panix.com[/email])
To all,
Harvey and I have already discussed our own dissatisfaction with the delays in this game. How does everyone else feel about it?
Jorge
2010/2/6 Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])>
Hi Harvey,
What do you think? This is starting to turn into a joke.
Jorge
2010/2/6 Charles Féaux de la Croix <charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])>
Hi guys,
I shall not be adjucating right now. I hope that I shall be able to do so before too long.
Charles
Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us now[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - txurce (Feb 06, 2010, 10:59 am) |
I agree with Mike's assessment. There's no need for us to resign - why spoil so many unblemished track records? It is within our rights as players to call for a DIAS. This vote seems to have passed, assuming our brand-new, yet-to-order Swedish leader doesn't object.
Jorge
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Mike Hoffman <mrh(at)panix.com ([email]mrh(at)panix.com[/email])> wrote:
I told Charles 2 weeks ago that I wouldn't mind calling the game, but
I'd also be willing to stick with it. Whatever the "majority" voted
for.
Considering these last messages, it's clear that the majority is
voting for DIAS.
So I vote for DIAS as well. If the vote isn't unanimous though, I'll
keep playing.
Mike
---------
"Shared Pain is lessened, Shared Joy is increased" --- Spider Robinson
"Whenever some act of wondrous power must be performed, Michael is
sent" --- Pope Saint Gregory the Great
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])> wrote:
[quote:83a83b9092]I would officially vote Yes for a DIAS, even though it deprives Nigs of his
shot at the crown of the HRE. Sometimes we have to make sacrifices for the
greater good.
Jorge
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
[quote:83a83b9092]
I agree with the general sentiment. It appears Charles is struggling with
time a little bit. I formally propose and vote yes for a DIAS. This way he
can be free of the adjudication responsibility and we can find other games.
Dirk
On Feb 6, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Marc Ellinger wrote:
I concur that I would like to have it be smoother. (Even in my poor
position!)
Marc.
Marc H. Ellinger, CPA
Attorney at Law
Blitz, Bardgett & Deutsch, LC
308 East High Street, Suite 301
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
(573) 634-2500
(573) 634-3358 (Facsimile)
The information transmitted in this e-mail message is intended only for
the addressee and may contain CONFIDENTIAL and/or PRIVILEGED material. Any
interception, review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, or
taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than
the intended recipient is UNAUTHORIZED, prohibited by law and may subject
such users to criminal or civil penalty. If you received this communication
in error, please (1) contact the sender above; (2) advise Blitz, Bardgett &
Deutsch of such receipt; and (3) delete the communication completely from
your computer or network system.
PLEASE NOTE: The Missouri Bar Disciplinary Counsel requires all Missouri
lawyers to notify all recipients of e-mail that (1) e-mail communication is
not a secure method of communication, (2) any e-mail that is sent to you or
by you may be copied and held by various computers it passes through as it
goes from me to you or vice versa, (3) persons not participating in our
communication may intercept our communications by improperly accessing your
computer or my computer or even some computer unconnected to either of us
which the e-mail passed through. I am communicating to you via e-mail
because you have consented to receive communications via this medium. If you
change your mind and want future communications to be sent in a different
fashion, please let me know AT ONCE.
________________________________
From: Nigel PHILLIPS [mailto:nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email])]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 9:56 AM
To: Jorge England 214; charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])
Cc: gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]);
aislattery(at)aol.com ([email]aislattery(at)aol.com[/email]); dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); Mikael Johansson; hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email]);
Marc Ellinger; Mike Leprecaun
Subject: RE: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
I do get confused by some of Charles' more enigmatic messages, and
austria's leaving the game seemed to be because he wasn't playing as Charles
wanted him too, in a communicative manner. I find non-communication
unsocial, but not a reason for leaving a game by itself.
I would like to get a move on though
Nigs
________________________________
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 07:39:47 -0800
Subject: Re: 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation
From: jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])
To: charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])
CC: gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com ([email]gabriele.parachini(at)gmail.com[/email]); dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc279(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email]);
AiSlattery(at)aol.com ([email]AiSlattery(at)aol.com[/email]); dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email]); m_don_j(at)hotmail.com ([email]m_don_j(at)hotmail.com[/email]);
nephilli99(at)hotmail.com ([email]nephilli99(at)hotmail.com[/email]); hmtucaz(at)gmail.com ([email]hmtucaz(at)gmail.com[/email]); mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com ([email]mellinger(at)blitzbardgett.com[/email]);
mrh(at)panix.com ([email]mrh(at)panix.com[/email])
To all,
Harvey and I have already discussed our own dissatisfaction with the
delays in this game. How does everyone else feel about it?
Jorge
2010/2/6 Jorge Saralegui <jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com ([email]jmsaralegui(at)gmail.com[/email])>
Hi Harvey,
What do you think? This is starting to turn into a joke.
Jorge
2010/2/6 Charles Féaux de la Croix <charlesf(at)web.de ([email]charlesf(at)web.de[/email])>
Hi guys,
I shall not be adjucating right now. I hope that I shall be able to do so
before too long.
Charles
________________________________
Got a cool Hotmail story? Tell us now
[/quote:83a83b9092]
[/quote:83a83b9092][Reply] |
