Warren


 


I haven't looked to
see where the rules stand on this one, but I don't think that the ruling on the
game-end proposal is in the best interests of all concerned.


 


Obviously if anyone
wants to vote no to the draw then fine, but if as I suspect four active players
vote yes and two inactive players don't vote I can't see that it helps if the
game-end proposal is defeated.


 


If Russia does drop
out I am not happy at the possibility of a replacement. My whole strategy in the
game has been based on building up a good understanding and alliance with Russia
and the possibility of him being replaced by a psychotic stabber or a complete
novice doesn't bear thinking about.


 


I have already been
stuffed once by the replacement of a useless England with someone who is a cross
between Albert Einstein and Paul McKenna and I don't want to leave this game
with nothing because of the constant change in personnel. If everyone still
playing wants a draw let's agree to put this game out of its
misery.


 


Mike




-----Original Message-----
From: Warren Fleming
[mailto:alwayshunted(at)hotmail.com]
Sent: 05 March 2011
00:16
To: welsh_stroud(at)msn.com; musclecat(at)ntlworld.com;
pjh5000(at)hotmail.com; llibertv(at)mixmail.com; dc347(at)diplomaticcorp.com;
tim_crosby(at)hotmail.com; buckhamil(at)yahoo.com; Warren
Subject: DC 347,
Summer 1905


Okay, no word from Paul so his fleet goes
away. Anyone know what has become of our fearless Russian
leader?
 
There is a new proposal on the table for
a four way E/F/G/I. Votes are due with fall orders, and just a reminder that
it MUST be unanimous. That means I need six yes votes, but the person that
proposed it is already assumed to have voted yes.
 
Fall
1905 is due in one week, on Friday March 11, 17:00 MST.

New
maps are attached. Enjoy.
 
Warren