Jerry,

I'm all right with postponing for two weeks. S'all good.

Trout

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:17 PM, dc193 <dc193(at)diplomaticcorp.com ([email]dc193(at)diplomaticcorp.com[/email])> wrote:

This game was postponed 2 weeks in starting and if held again would be
another 2 weeks. Is everyone willing to wait two+ weeks to resume this
game? If so, then I'll set the deadline for Spring 42 at August 6th -
and we'll play from there.

Jerry

Mickstagman(at)aol.com ([email]Mickstagman(at)aol.com[/email]) wrote:
:
I am not happy about having somone stand in for me for two moves, as
my stratagies & relationships with other players will certainly be
compromised; however it is not my decision to make!
If a standin is used, I think it only right that the standin player
takes over GB through to the end of the game, (which is quite likely
what the GM preffers?). But I would like it made clear that I am not
resigning from the game, as once I commit myself to a game, I see it
through to a conclusion. Other email diplomacy games that I am
involved in have been put on hold, as like this one, I notified the GM
in plenty of time that I would be unavailable through family
commitments. It seems as though a precedence has now been set in this
game.
Mick



[font=Monotype Corsiva]Gerald Todd[/font]
[font=Georgia]The Diplomacy Tribune[/font]