Okay. I voted Yes because i wanted to see the game speed up rather than slow down.
That way i could lock my orders in before i go, and then Jason can set a deadline say next Monday or Tuesday
and one the week after that... reducing the impact of me being away and speeding the game ip.

Perhaps i could suggest to the 'no' voters, if no replacements been found by the end of January - should we
revist this - or just delay inevitably?


Stephen
aka Deathblade_penguin (Knight of the Garter)
at www.diplomaticcorp.com

Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:16:37 -0700
From: former.trout(at)gmail.com
To: julien.crawford(at)gmail.com
Subject: Re: DC 134 Vote
CC: githraine(at)yahoo.com; dc134(at)diplomaticcorp.com; fixedbythepotter(at)yahoo.com; stevelytton(at)hotmail.com; jorgesaralegui(at)verizon.net; mike(at)southwall.com; thewizard.tim(at)gmail.com; wardus2274(at)hotmail.com

I second the no-vote. Lets find a sacrificial lamb, er, I mean Whitecloak.. =)

Trout

On Jan 21, 2008 3:13 PM, Jules <julien.crawford(at)gmail.com ([email]julien.crawford(at)gmail.com[/email])> wrote:
[quote:b0926be7bf]No


On Jan 22, 2008 8:33 AM, Jason K < githraine(at)yahoo.com ([email]githraine(at)yahoo.com[/email])> wrote:
[quote:b0926be7bf] It has been proposed that we have had too many replacements on this map and we need to push on before everyone loses interest.
To that end I will take a vote on breaking the stated house rules on this issue.
Please respond to this email by Wednesday evening, Jan 23rd.
Vote Yes to move the Whitecloaks to Civil Disorder, No to find a replacement.
I will go with a simple Majority, all votes required.

Jason


Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

[/quote:b0926be7bf]

[/quote:b0926be7bf]Find it at www.seek.com.au Your Future Starts Here. Dream it? Then be it!